|
000
| 03255cam 2200385za 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 9.829631 |
|---|
| 003 | CaOODSP |
|---|
| 005 | 20221107145332 |
|---|
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| |
|---|
| 008 | 161228s1994 onc ob f000 0 eng d |
|---|
| 040 | |aCaOODSP|beng |
|---|
| 043 | |an-cn--- |
|---|
| 086 | 1 |aZ1-1991/1-41-72E-PDF |
|---|
| 245 | 00|aRenouncing the old rules of the game |h[electronic resource] : |bCrown conduct in the context of litigation involving Aboriginal peoples / |cby Peter W. Hutchins and Anjali Choksi. |
|---|
| 246 | 30|aCrown conduct in the context of litigation involving Aboriginal peoples |
|---|
| 260 | |a[Ottawa] : |bRoyal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, |c[1994] |
|---|
| 300 | |a[72] p. (un-numbered pages) |
|---|
| 500 | |aIssued also in French under title: Renoncer aux anciennes règles du jeu : la conduite de la Couronne dans les litiges mettant en cause des peuples autochtones. |
|---|
| 500 | |aHistorical publication digitized by the Privy Council Office of Canada. |
|---|
| 500 | |aCover title. |
|---|
| 500 | |a"Paper prepared as part of the Research Program of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, September 1994." |
|---|
| 504 | |aIncludes bibliographical references. |
|---|
| 505 | 0 |aThe fiduciary relationship -- Current options available to First Nations seeking to invoke their rights -- Financial considerations involved in instituting and defending legal proceedings on Aboriginal and treaty rights -- Government conduct in the context of litigation with Aboriginal peoples -- Departmental responsibility under the Indian Act pursuant to court decisions -- Comparative models: the experience of the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs -- Summary and recommendations. |
|---|
| 520 | 3 |a“In its judgement in R. v. Sparrow the Supreme Court of Canada directed: [T]he Government has the responsibility to act in a fiduciary capacity with respect to aboriginal peoples. The relationship between the Government and aboriginals is trust-like, rather than adversarial, and contemporary recognition and affirmation of aboriginal rights must be defined in light of this historic relationship. In this report we outline the key features of the historical relationship between the Crown and Aboriginal peoples. We explore the manner in which the conduct of the Crown in circumstances surrounding litigation with Aboriginal peoples has or has not met the standard required by this relationship as confirmed in Sparrow. We study the general nature of the litigation process between the Crown and First Nations, as well as specific examples of Crown conduct, and examine how those examples are the product of the current litigation process. Suggestions for reform of the system are then presented"--Intro., p. [6]. |
|---|
| 692 | 07|2gccst|aCommissions of inquiry |
|---|
| 692 | 07|2gccst|aAboriginal peoples |
|---|
| 692 | 07|2gccst|aFederal government |
|---|
| 692 | 07|2gccst|aLitigation |
|---|
| 710 | 1 |aCanada. |bPrivy Council Office. |
|---|
| 710 | 1 |aCanada. |bRoyal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. |
|---|
| 720 | |aHutchins, Peter W. |
|---|
| 720 | |aChoksi, Anjali. |
|---|
| 720 | |aHutchins, Soroka & Dionne. |
|---|
| 775 | 08|tRenoncer aux anciennes règles du jeu |w(CaOODSP)9.829632 |
|---|
| 856 | 40|qPDF|s511 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/bcp-pco/Z1-1991-1-41-72-eng.pdf |
|---|