This document was
prepared by the staff of the Parliamentary Research Branch to provide Canadian
Parliamentarians with plain language background and analysis of proposed government
legislation. Legislative summaries are not government documents. They have no official
legal status and do not constitute legal advice or opinion. Please note, the Legislative
Summary describes the bill as of the date shown at the beginning of the document. For the
latest published version of the bill, please consult the parliamentary internet site at www.parl.gc.ca.
LS-368E
BILL C-5: AN ACT TO ESTABLISH THE
CANADIAN TOURISM COMMISSION
Prepared by:
Geoffrey Kieley
Law and Government Division
8 May 2000
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF BILL C-5
HOUSE OF COMMONS |
SENATE |
Bill Stage |
Date |
Bill Stage |
Date |
First Reading: |
15 October 1999 |
First Reading: |
14 June 2000 |
Second Reading: |
10 May 2000 |
Second Reading: |
|
Committee Report: |
8 June 2000 |
Committee Report: |
|
Report Stage: |
12 June 2000 |
Report Stage: |
|
Third Reading: |
13 June 2000 |
Third Reading: |
|
Royal Assent:
Statutes of Canada
N.B. Any substantive changes in this Legislative Summary which have
been made since the preceding issue are indicated in bold print.
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BACKGROUND
DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS
COMMENTARY
BILL C-5: AN ACT TO ESTABLISH THE
CANADIAN TOURISM COMMISSION
BACKGROUND
Bill C-5, An Act to establish the
Canadian Tourism Commission, was tabled by the Minister of Industry and given First
Reading in the House of Commons on 15 October 1999. It had been presented in an
identical form as C-75 during the 1st session of the 36th Parliament (18 March 1999),
but died when that session was prorogued on 18 September 1999.
The bill would make the Canadian
Tourism Commission (hereinafter the Commission), which has been in existence since 1995 as
a Special Operating Agency (SOA),(1) into a Crown
corporation under Schedule III (Part 1) of the Financial Administration Act(2) and governed by Part X of that Act (see clause 49 of the
bill).
The proposed change of legal
status is intended to give the Commission "more flexibility and freedom to achieve
its goal of partnering with the tourism industry and the federal government to sustain a
vibrant and profitable national tourism industry."(3)
With the status of a Crown corporation, the Commission would enjoy greater administrative,
financial and personnel independence.
Consultations with private-sector
partners, provincial Deputy Ministers, employees and employee representatives apparently
found strong support for this legislative measure. All partners agree that the Commission
"needs more independence so it can realize the full potential of its core
partnerships and unique governance structure."(4)
Current Commission employees have
been assured that they would have job security in the new Crown corporation (see in
particular clauses 31-33 of the bill, dealing with continuance of the functions of members
of the Board, and clauses 41-46, dealing with human resources and staff relations).
The Minister of Industry would
continue to be responsible for tourism policy.(5)
DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS
The Commission would be a
corporation (clause 3) acting as an agent of Her Majesty in right of Canada (clause 4) and
would have the capacity of a natural person (clause 6(1)). In particular, the Commission
would be able to enter into agreements with provincial and territorial governments to
carry out its objects (clause 26). Its objects would include sustaining a vibrant and
profitable Canadian tourism industry (clause 5). Its head office would be in Canada at a
place designated by the Governor in Council (clause 24).
The affairs and business of the
Commission would be managed by a Board of Directors (clause 7) consisting of no more than
26 directors (clause 8), comprising:
a Chairperson, appointed by the
Governor in Council (clause 9);
a President, appointed by the
Governor in Council (clause 10);
up to 16 private-sector
directors(6), consisting of up to seven tourism operators
representing all regions of Canada and up to nine private sector representatives, all to
be appointed by the Minister with the approval of the Governor in Council on the advice of
a committee established by the Board (clause 11);
up to seven public sector
directors appointed by the Minister in the numbers set out in clause 11(3)(a)(i)-(vi)
with the approval of the Governor in Council (clause 12);
the Deputy Minister of Industry
(clause 13).
The Board would be empowered to
make by-laws (clause 23), including a code of ethics for the Commissions directors
and employees (clause 23(a)). The directors (apart from the President) would be
paid fees as fixed by the Governor in Council (clause 16) and would, for purposes of
compensation, be deemed government employees(7) and
members of the federal Public Service.(8)
The President of the Commission
would be its chief executive officer (clause 19), with responsibility for managing the
Commissions internal affairs, including the hiring and terminating of staff(9) (see the other provisions dealing with personnel in
clauses 27-28). The President could delegate his or her authority to any other person
(clause 21). The Presidents salary would be fixed by the Governor in Council (clause
15).
Clauses 29-46 govern the terms
and conditions of the transition from the existing Commission (referred to in the bill as
the "former Commission" - clause 29) and the new Commission.
The new Act would come into force
on a day fixed by order of the Governor in Council.
COMMENTARY
While stakeholders have generally
expressed broad support for Bill C-5, opposition members in the House of Commons raised
certain concerns during second reading debate:
Accountability to Parliament:
Some members expressed concerns that by being removed from Industry Canada, the agency
would cease to be accountable to Parliament. However, section 88 of the Financial
Administration Act states that "each Crown corporation is ultimately accountable,
through the appropriate Minister, to Parliament for the conduct of its affairs."
Under section 89(1) of that Act, "the Governor in Council may, on the recommendation
of the appropriate Minister, give a directive to any parent Crown corporation, if the
Governor in Council is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so."
That directive must be laid before each House of Parliament on any of the first fifteen
days on which that House is sitting after the directive is given. In addition to having
the power to issue directives, the Minister would exercise a degree of control over the
agency by virtue of his or her power of appointment. Parliament would, as well, exercise a
degree of control through its power to review the annual appropriation of the agency.
Representation on the Board of
Directors: up to 16 private sector directors and up to seven public sector directors would
be appointed by the Minister with the approval of the Governor in Council; of these, 14
would be appointed according to their region. Two issues were raised: a) whether the
allocation of board positions on the basis of region would adequately represent regional
interests; and b) whether the provinces would be adequately represented.
Provincial/Federal
Jurisdiction: Members of the Bloc Québécois raised concerns that the Commission would
infringe on provincial jurisdiction in matters relating to tourism. The bill, in clause
6(2), would prohibit the Commission from initiating or financing programs involving the
acquisition or construction of real property, immovables or facilities related to tourism.
(1)
For information on the nature of an SOA, please consult the following document: Treasury
Board Secretariat, Becoming a Special Operating Agency, March 1986, 36p. It is
available electronically at http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/SI-SI/ASD/english/resources/download/becomsoa_e.pdf.
(2)
R.S.C. 1985, c. F-11.
(3)
Press Release, Industry Canada, Minister Manley Re-Introduces Legislation Designed to
Strengthen Role of the Canadian Tourism Commission, Information Bulletin, Ottawa, 15
October 1999. The bulletin is available electronically at
http://www.ic.gc.ca/cmb/welcomeic.nsf/558d636590992942852564880052155b/ 85256779007b79ee8525680b005c484f?OpenDocument
(4)
Ibid.,
(5)
Ibid.,
(6)
The expressions "private sector director," "tourism operator" and
"private sector representative" are defined in clause 11(5) of the bill.
(7)
Government Employees Compensation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. G-5.
(8)
Presumption for application of the regulations made under the Aeronautics Act,
R.S.C. 1985, c. A-2.
(9)
According to the CTC Backgrounder, the Commission would "assume the role of
employer and have the authority to hire, manage and negotiate terms and conditions of
employment for all staff." Canadian employees would be governed and protected by the Canada
Labour Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. L-2. Press Release, Industry Canada, Minister
Manley Re-Introduces Legislation Designed to Strengthen Role of the Canadian Tourism
Commission, Information Bulletin, Ottawa, 15 October 1999, p. 3 of 6. The
bulletin is available electronically at
http://www.ic.gc.ca/cmb/welcomeic.nsf/558d636590992942852564880052155b/ 85256779007b79ee8525680b005c484f?OpenDocument
|