Parliamentary Research Branch

 

PRB 98-5E

ANALYSIS – DAIRY BLEND IMPORTS AND
SUPPLY MANAGEMENT IN CANADA

Prepared by:
Jean-Denis Fréchette
Economics Division
October 1998


The economic importance of imports of butteroil/sugar blends under tariff item 2106.90.95 goes far beyond the displacement of 3.086 million kilograms of fat (roughly 2% of the Canadian market sharing quota (MSQ)). Even if the value of those imports, approximately $20 million, is viewed in relation to producers’ total revenue of $3.8 billion in 1997, the numbers do not reveal the real problem underlying dairy blend imports.

Butteroil blend imports are the first tangible impact of the tariff system put in place as a result of the Uruguay Round in order to open up markets and liberalize trade. The ultimate goal is to clear the way for better distribution of the world’s agri-food resources but, before that can be achieved, there is a necessary transition phase that tariffs help to make more progressive. All countries know the rules of the tariff game and its potential impact on domestic markets, but some industries in some countries are finding the impact to be harder to deal with than they had anticipated.

Whether or not the classification of butteroil imports under tariff item 2106.90.95 rather than 0404.90 is the result of an administrative error by government employees, as the DFC claim, the fact remains that a growing number of imported dairy products or blends will be on the Canadian market in the future. The Canadian International Trade Tribunal’s prediction that the penetration by butteroil blends could reach 25% of the fat requirement for ice cream and replaceable fat for processed cheese illustrates only one facet of what might lie ahead for the dairy industry.

For processors of dairy products, the value of dairy blends is still primarily economic; that is, they allow dairy products to be manufactured at the least cost, whether for the domestic market or for export. For Canadian dairy farmers, this means they will have to constantly evaluate the flexibility of supply management and their willingness to provide milkfat at a competitive price. The optional export program, which gives exporters access to milkfat at competitive prices, has been a qualified success among producers. Further, the proceedings taken by the United States before the WCO against Canadian tariffs applicable to Class 5 milk products, whose pricing system aims to help exporters and processors stay competitive on world markets, could very well make dairy farmers less inclined to provide milkfat on the basis of a dual pricing system.

For government decisionmakers, the challenge will be to support a viable form of supply management that can be reconciled with growing imports (itself a contradiction) and at the same time get Canadian consumers to agree to "subsidize" a dairy industry export strategy that forces them to pay higher domestic prices. Finally, as far as consumers are concerned, the debate over butteroil/sugar blends shows that with the increasing development of new products, there may be a lack of product information and a need for the regulations governing the labelling of agri-food products to be reviewed and amended. Substituting butteroil for cream is certainly valid from the standpoint of an ice cream manufacturer who wants to stay competitive, but where labelling regulations require nothing more than the words "dairy content" to describe the butteroil substitute, it can be asked whether consumers are really able to make an informed choice.

Even though the tariff and market access system will continue to provide a buffer against massive imports of dairy products, there will be other cases where imported dairy blends manufactured (whether deliberately or not) to circumvent the tariff-rate quotas will compete with milkfat produced in Canada. Moreover, the development and penetration of new dairy or "dairy-like" products will increase as markets open up. The next wave of "dairy products" to create a stir could well be butter blends, butter substitutes containing up to 70% vegetable oil. Such blends are tremendously popular in the United States, where they are sold as dairy products, even though they are more closely related to margarine. Butter blend imports are subject to a tariff-rate quota of more than 200%, but their production in Canada, already permitted in some provinces, could well take off.

This new instalment in the history of butteroil/sugar blend imports opens one more crack in the structure of supply management and again raises the question "where is the balance between the intrinsic rigidity of supply management and the flexibility needed for it to grow?"