<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc:record>
    <marc:leader>00000nam##2200000za#4500</marc:leader>
    <marc:controlfield tag="001">9.614934</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="003">CaOODSP</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="005">20211126112847</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="007">ta</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="008">150406|1999||||xxc|||||     f|0| 0 eng|d</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">0-662-28177-2</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">1192-5434</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CaOODSP</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">eng</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">n-cn---</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="086" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">FB3-2/99-13E</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="110" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Bank of Canada.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
      <marc:subfield code="a">The indicator models of core inflation for Canada / </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">by Richard Dion. </marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Ottawa - Ontario : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Bank of Canada </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">1999.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">v, 20p. : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">references, tables ; </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">28 cm.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Working paper</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="x">1192-5434</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">99-13</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"When there is uncertainty about estimates of the margin of unused capacity in the economy, examining a range of inflation indicators may help in assessing the balance of risks regarding the outlook for inflation. This paper tests a wide range of observable variables for their leading-indicator properties with respect to core inflation, including: commodity prices, cost indicators, measures of capacity pressures in labour and product markets, and components of the consumer price index (CPI) itself. After a preliminary screening of indicators using Granger causality tests, estimated bivariate indicator models generate post-sample static forecasts one quarter ahead and two quarters ahead over the period 1995 (Q1). A ridge regression technique is used to optimally combine selected bivariate forecasts into multivariate forecasts. The root-mean-squared errors of both the bivariate and multivariate forecasts are compared with those of benchmark models -- a Phillips curve, an autoregressive model, and two naive models."--Abstract.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">When there is uncertainty about estimates of the margin of unused capacity in the economy, examining a range of inflation indicators may help in assessing the balance of risks regarding the outlook for inflation. This paper tests a wide range of observable variables for their leading-indicator properties with respect to core inflation, including: commodity prices, cost indicators, measures of capacity pressures in labour and product markets, and components of the consumer price index (CPI) itself. After a preliminary screening of indicators using Granger causality tests, estimated bivariate indicator models generate post-sample static forecasts one quarter ahead and two quarters ahead over the period 1995 (Q1). A ridge regression technique is used to optimally combine selected bivariate forecasts into multivariate forecasts. The root-mean-squared errors of both the bivariate and multivariate forecasts are compared with those of benchmark models -- a Phillips curve, an autoregressive model, and two naive models.--Abstract</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Résumés en français</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="563" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Softcover</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="590" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">99-41</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">1999-10-15</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="690" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Inflation</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="2">gcpds</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="690" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Forecasting</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="2">gcpds</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="690" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Models</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="2">gcpds</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="720" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Dion, Richard</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="#">
      <marc:subfield code="t">The indicator models of core inflation for Canada / </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.571697</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="830" ind1="#" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Working paper,</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="x">1192-5434</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">99-13</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.514622</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="986" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">99-13</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
  </marc:record>
</marc:collection>
