<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc:record>
    <marc:leader>00000nam  2200000za 4500</marc:leader>
    <marc:controlfield tag="001">9.800722</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="003">CaOODSP</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="005">20221107134649</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="008">160420s2015    oncd    ob   f000 0 eng d</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">978-0-660-02290-1</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CaOODSP</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">eng</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">n-cn---</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="086" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Iu4-161/2015E-PDF</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Evaluation of the industrial and regional benefits policy </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="h">[electronic resource] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">final report.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">[Ottawa] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Industry Canada, </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">2015.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">iii, 53 p. : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">fig., graphs, tables</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Issued also in French under title: Évaluation de la politique des retombées industrielles et régionales, rapport final.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">“Prepared for: Industry Canada. Prepared by: Goss Gilroy Inc. Management Consultants.”</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">The objective of the Industrial and Regional Benefits (IRB) Policy is to contribute to the continuing viability of Canadian companies’ capabilities in high technology manufacturing and services, and to improve their ability to compete in both domestic and international markets. The policy is applied routinely to defence and security procurements over $100M and is discretionary for procurements between $2M and $100M. Under the policy, winning bidders (prime contractors) must undertake business activities in Canada equal to the value of the contract (IRB obligations). Prime contractors are encouraged through a variety of IRB policy features to undertake high quality, export-oriented activities with competitive Canadian industrial firms (IRB recipients) across Canada’s regions. There are five eligibility criteria that an IRB contractor must demonstrate when they submit an IRB transaction to Industry Canada for review: causality, incrementality, the Canadian Content Value, timing and eligible party. The objective of this evaluation was to provide program management with information on the impact of the IRB Policy to inform decision-making. The evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Directive on the Evaluation Function, and addressed the core issues of relevance and performance. The evaluation covered the five-year period from April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2013, and it focused on the aspects of the IRB Policy that pertain to Industry Canada. The evaluation utilized the following methodologies: a document review and administrative data analysis; a literature review; key informant interviews (n=37); case studies; and a survey (n=140 recipient firms). The evaluation also utilized an input-output (I/O) model to assess the impacts of the IRB Policy on Gross Domestic Product.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Policy review</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Purchasing</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Defence industry</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Business development</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="710" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Canada. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Industry Canada. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Audit and Evaluation Branch.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="775" ind1="0" ind2="8">
      <marc:subfield code="t">Évaluation de la politique des retombées industrielles et régionales </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.800723</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="q">PDF</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="s">444 KB</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="u">https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/isde-ised/Iu4-161-2015-eng.pdf</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
  </marc:record>
</marc:collection>
