<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc:record>
    <marc:leader>00000nam  2200000za 4500</marc:leader>
    <marc:controlfield tag="001">9.802698</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="003">CaOODSP</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="005">20221107135037</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="008">161024s2012    onc     o    f000 0 eng d</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CaOODSP</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">eng</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">n-cn---</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="086" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Iu4-185/2012E-PDF</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="110" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Canada. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Industry Canada. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Audit and Evaluation Branch.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Audit report - audit of the departmental departure process </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="h">[electronic resource] / </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">Audit and Evaluation Branch.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="246" ind1="3" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Audit of the departmental departure process </marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Report on the audit of the departmental departure process</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">[Ottawa] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Industry Canada, </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">[2012]</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">v, 16 p.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Issued also in French under title: Rapport de vérification - vérification du processus ministériel relatif aux départs.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"March 2012."</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"Recommended for Approval to the Deputy Minister by the Departmental Audit Committee on April 20, 2012. Approved by the Deputy Minister on April 23, 2012."</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"In accordance with the approved Industry Canada 2011-2014 Multi-Year Risk-Based Audit Plan, the Audit and Evaluation Branch (AEB) undertook an audit of the Departmental Departure Process. The Treasury Board Directive on Financial Management of Pay Administration deals with departure procedures and requires that the Chief Financial Officer establish management practices and controls to ensure effective internal control over the financial management of pay administration. This includes establishing, in collaboration with Human Resources, a departure report and checklist process to sign off and certify that all money owing to the Crown, or any other material, is accounted for before an employee leaves the department. The process is to include sign off by such areas as human resources, security, material management, administration, library, and financial services. In September 2010, Industry Canada (IC) assessed its departure process. The review led to the development of a new Departmental Departure Process that includes a directive, an automated notification and a revised form. Prior to the implementation of the new process, six different departure forms and different processes existed within Industry Canada. Establishing a new process also served to integrate the different parties involved in the departure process and eliminate “silos” within the department. Communication activities were undertaken prior to the implementation, which included briefings to management committees, information sessions, emails to managers and employees and the development of a new Departure Process Website. The new process was launched December 20, 2010 in the National Capital Region and June 6, 2011 in the Regions”--p. 1.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Personnel management</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Federal departments</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Audit</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="775" ind1="0" ind2="8">
      <marc:subfield code="t">Rapport de vérifiction - vérification du processus ministériel relatif aux départs </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.802699</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="q">PDF</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="s">128 KB</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="u">https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/isde-ised/Iu4-185-2012-eng.pdf</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
  </marc:record>
</marc:collection>
