000 01845cam  2200289za 4500
0019.808024
003CaOODSP
00520221107140300
007cr |||||||||||
008151218s2011    quc     ob   f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aIP54-65/2011E-PDF
1001 |aBarrigar, Jennifer.
24510|aGuided literature review |h[electronic resource] : |bidentity management systems / |cJennifer Barrigar.
260 |aGatineau, QC : |bOffice of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, |c2011.
300 |a15 p.
500 |aIssued also in French under title: Examen dirigé de la documentation, systèmes de gestion de l’identité.
500 |a“February 2011.”
504 |aIncludes bibliographic references.
520 |aReviewing selected information about Federated Identity Management Systems (FIdM), it quickly becomes clear that this technology has an almost Schrödingerian quality to it – that is, online identity management, by virtue of potentially falling into either state, may be said to be simultaneously incredibly beneficial and terribly detrimental. A properly designed and implemented FIdM system has, in theory, the capacity to enhance privacy, facilitate meaningful anonymity, and subvert behavioural tracking. Equally possible, however, is the risk that an improperly designed and implemented FIdM system could exacerbate existing problems and, by virtue of creating a new repository of data and process of sharing, create new ones.
69207|2gccst|aIdentification
69207|2gccst|aInformation systems
69207|2gccst|aPrivacy
7102 |aOffice of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.
77508|tExamen dirigé de la documentation |w(CaOODSP)9.808072
85640|qPDF|s350 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2015/priv/IP54-65-2011-eng.pdf