000 01746cam  2200301za 4500
0019.821192
003CaOODSP
00520221107143410
007cr |||||||||||
008160718s2008    onc|||||o    f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng
041 |aeng|bfre
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aD68-5/052-2008E-PDF
1001 |aYu, Esther.
24510|aPeacetime attrition analysis of selected unmanned aerial vehicles |h[electronic resource] / |cby Esther Yu.
260 |a[Ottawa] : |bDefence Research and Development Canada, |cc2008.
300 |aviii, 14 p. : |bfigures, tables, graphs.
4901 |aTechnical Note ; |v2008-052
500 |a"December 2008."
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 |aThis research was conducted in support of two upcoming studies: a study regarding manned versus unmanned aircraft for various defence missions and tasks, and a review of peacetime attrition for various classes of aircraft, including both manned and unmanned. The attrition rates for selected unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), such as Predator, Pioneer, and Hunter were researched and compared to the Canadian Forces’ experience with the Sperwer system. Attrition will be dependent on the experience level of the organization employing the aircraft, and the maturity of the aircraft system itself. This relationship is investigated using linear regression analysis.
69207|2gccst|aTechnical reports
693 4|aAttrition rates
693 4|aUnmanned aerial vehicles
7101 |aCanada. |bDefence R&D Canada.
830#0|aTechnical note (Defence R&D Canada)|v2008-052|w(CaOODSP)9.820563
85640|qPDF|s339 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/rddc-drdc/D68-5-052-2008-eng.pdf