| 000 | 00000nam 2200000za 4500 |
| 001 | 9.821199 |
|---|
| 003 | CaOODSP |
|---|
| 005 | 20240219183437 |
|---|
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| |
|---|
| 008 | 160718s2011 onc|||||o f000 0 eng d |
|---|
| 040 | |aCaOODSP|beng |
|---|
| 041 | |aeng|bfre |
|---|
| 043 | |an-cn--- |
|---|
| 086 | 1 |aD68-5/116-2011E-PDF |
|---|
| 100 | 1 |aMartell, Bill. |
|---|
| 245 | 10|aLP/SV bladder buoyancy test comparison |h[electronic resource] / |cby Bill Martell and Ryan Wolter. |
|---|
| 260 | |a[Ottawa] : |bDefence Research and Development Canada, |cc2011. |
|---|
| 300 | |aiv, 14 p. : |bfigures. |
|---|
| 490 | 1 |aTechnical Note ; |v2011-116 |
|---|
| 500 | |a"July 2011." |
|---|
| 504 | |aIncludes bibliographical references. |
|---|
| 520 | |aBackground: The buoyancy of CF jet aircrew LP/SV is unknown and may not provide the minimum 35 lbs that is required. The buoyant force of the British MK 30 LCX is also unknown; however, this flotation device utilizes a large bladder and may replace the LP/SV. Aim: The aim of this experiment was to calculate and compare the buoyant force of the CF LP/SV and the British MK 30 LCX. Methods: Bladders were inflated using either a 35g or a 45g CO2 canister. A Chatillon spring scale was used to measure the buoyant force following submersion. Results: The LP/SV and MK 30 LCX attained buoyant forces of 41 and 42 lbs respectively following inflation using a 35g CO2 canister, and 45 and 53 lbs respectively following inflation using a 45g CO2 canister. Conclusion: In all trials, both flotation devices produced buoyant forces greater that 35 lbs. The British MK 30 LCX produced larger buoyancy forces. |
|---|
| 692 | 07|2gccst|aTechnical reports |
|---|
| 693 | 4|aLife preserver |
|---|
| 693 | 4|aSafety vest |
|---|
| 700 | 1 |aWolter, Ryan. |
|---|
| 710 | 2 |aDefence R&D Canada. |
|---|
| 830 | #0|aTechnical note (Defence R&D Canada)|v2011-116|w(CaOODSP)9.820563 |
|---|
| 856 | 40|qPDF|s868 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/rddc-drdc/D68-5-116-2011-eng.pdf |
|---|