000 02731cam  2200289za 4500
0019.821226
003CaOODSP
00520221107143415
007cr |||||||||||
008160718s2013    onc|||||o    f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng
041 |aeng|bfre
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aD68-6/021-2013E-PDF
24500|aEffects of strategic-level interagency training |h[electronic resource] : |bthe National Security Program's exercise Strategic Warrior / |cby Megan M. Thompson ... [et al.].
260 |a[Ottawa] : |bDefence Research and Development Canada, |cc2013.
300 |axiv, 33 p. : |bfigures, tables, graphs.
4901 |aTechnical Memorandum ; |v2013-021
500 |a"February 2013."
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 |aThe current research assessed the training evaluations of senior Canadian Forces (CF), international military, and Canadian civilian Government Partners who participated in Exercise (EX) STRATEGIC WARRIOR 12, a strategic-level operational planning exercise that is part of the 10-month National Security Program at the Canadian Forces College in Toronto. Fifteen student volunteers (4 Civilian, 9 CF, 2 Other Military) completed an initial demographic survey. Twenty-four volunteers (6 Civilian, 10 CF, 8 Other Military) completed a post-EX survey designed to capture students’ assessments of various aspects of the STRATEGIC WARRIOR training exercise. Descriptive analyses revealed that, in general, both civilian and military participants felt that the exercise was valuable and that the team processes related to the EX within their syndicates were successful. Most civilians felt that the EX took into account important aspects of the mandates, processes, and approaches of their home organizations. However, only half of the civilians felt that the EX prepared them for future roles in developing a strategic response to a complex conflict environment. Future research should explore additional methodologies for assessing the value of interagency training: for instance, through a comparison of student and subject-matter expert assessments, longitudinal research comparing training assessments to operational processes and outcomes during comprehensive missions, and, where possible, the development of objective measures of performance and operational effectiveness.
69207|2gccst|aTechnical reports
693 4|aInteragency training
7001 |aThompson, Megan M.|q(Megan Mari-Ane),|d1958-
7101 |aCanada. |bDefence R&D Canada.
830#0|aTechnical memorandum (Defence R&D Canada)|v2013-021|w(CaOODSP)9.820564
85640|qPDF|s558 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/rddc-drdc/D68-6-021-2013-eng.pdf