<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc:record>
    <marc:leader>00000nam  2200000za 4500</marc:leader>
    <marc:controlfield tag="001">9.821381</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="003">CaOODSP</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="005">20240219183449</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="008">160720s2013    onc|||||o    f000 0 eng d</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CaOODSP</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">eng</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">eng</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">fre</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">n-cn---</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="086" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">D68-6/227-2013E-PDF</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Ma, Fred.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Sale price as a component of life cycle costing for second hand platforms </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="h">[electronic resource] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">decpreciation modelling in the context of the FFG-7 frigate / </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">by Fred Ma.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">[Ottawa] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Defence Research and Development Canada, </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">c2013.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">xiii, 63 p. : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">tables, figures.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Technical Memorandum ; </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">2013-227</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"December 2013."</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">In Q3 of 2012, as a subtask within a Director Materiel Policy and Procedures Major Equipment Procurement Study (New versus Used), Directorate Materiel Group Operational Research (DMGOR) planned a study into the life cycle costing of second hand platforms (vehicles, ships, aircraft). As an initial input into that study, DMGOR undertook the estimation of the depreciation of two classes of frigates, the U.S. FFG-7 and the Dutch Kortenaer, from second hand sales prices. That work is reported here. A database of both frigate classes was developed from open source, but new and used price data were readily available only for the FFG-7s. Depreciation fit an exponential decay model, with an average loss of 8.4%/year and a 68% (±1 sigma) confidence interval of [5.9%, 11.1%]/year. One variable, vessel age, explained up to 56% of the second used sale price data. The data was not sufficient to extract the portion of depreciation due to aging design/technology rather than physical aging of the platform, but neither did it contradict published cost growth trend of 2%/year for buying new vessels of this type. Because of the projected growth in real cost for new defence platforms, a thorough analysis of procurement options is becoming increasingly important, including the life cycle costing of buying used. This is an essential part of comparing with buying new that ideally includes platform suitability, proficiency, and timeliness of full operational capability.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Technical reports</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="693" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Categorical variables</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="693" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Depreciation</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="693" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Confidence bands</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Defence R&amp;D Canada.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="830" ind1="#" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Technical memorandum (Defence R&amp;D Canada)</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">2013-227</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.820564</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="q">PDF</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="s">886 KB</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="u">https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/rddc-drdc/D68-6-227-2013-eng.pdf</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
  </marc:record>
</marc:collection>
