000 01998cam  2200313za 4500
0019.821383
003CaOODSP
00520221107143438
007cr |||||||||||
008160720s2014    onc|||||o    f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng
041 |aeng|bfre
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aD68-6/230-2013E-PDF
1001 |aBourdon, Sean.
24512|aA method for evaluating mission risk for the National Fighter Procurement evaluation of options |h[electronic resource] / |cby Sean Bourdon.
260 |a[Ottawa] : |bDefence Research and Development Canada, |cc2014.
300 |axii, 36 p. : |btables, figures.
4901 |aTechnical Memorandum ; |v2013-230
500 |a"April 2014."
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 |aThe Government of Canada stood up the National Fighter Procurement Secretariat (NFPS) in response to the 2012 Spring Report of the Auditor General of Canada. Part of the NFPS mandate is to review, oversee, and coordinate the implementation of the Government’s Seven-Point Plan with the fourth step in this plan being to conduct an evaluation of options to sustain a fighter capability well into the twenty-first century. The goal of the evaluation of options is to articulate the risks associated with various CF-18 replacement options relative to their ability to fulfill the mission set outlined in the Canada First Defence Strategy. This report describes the method used to undertake the evaluation of options as part of the process to inform the Government of Canada’s decision on the best way forward for replacing the CF-18.
69207|2gccst|aTechnical reports
693 4|aEvaluation of options
693 4|aCapability-based planning
693 4|aMeasures of performance
7101 |aCanada. |bDefence R&D Canada.
830#0|aTechnical memorandum (Defence R&D Canada)|v2013-230|w(CaOODSP)9.820564
85640|qPDF|s977 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/rddc-drdc/D68-6-230-2013-eng.pdf