000
| 01998cam 2200313za 4500 |
---|
001 | 9.821383 |
---|
003 | CaOODSP |
---|
005 | 20221107143438 |
---|
007 | cr ||||||||||| |
---|
008 | 160720s2014 onc|||||o f000 0 eng d |
---|
040 | |aCaOODSP|beng |
---|
041 | |aeng|bfre |
---|
043 | |an-cn--- |
---|
086 | 1 |aD68-6/230-2013E-PDF |
---|
100 | 1 |aBourdon, Sean. |
---|
245 | 12|aA method for evaluating mission risk for the National Fighter Procurement evaluation of options |h[electronic resource] / |cby Sean Bourdon. |
---|
260 | |a[Ottawa] : |bDefence Research and Development Canada, |cc2014. |
---|
300 | |axii, 36 p. : |btables, figures. |
---|
490 | 1 |aTechnical Memorandum ; |v2013-230 |
---|
500 | |a"April 2014." |
---|
504 | |aIncludes bibliographical references. |
---|
520 | |aThe Government of Canada stood up the National Fighter Procurement Secretariat (NFPS) in response to the 2012 Spring Report of the Auditor General of Canada. Part of the NFPS mandate is to review, oversee, and coordinate the implementation of the Government’s Seven-Point Plan with the fourth step in this plan being to conduct an evaluation of options to sustain a fighter capability well into the twenty-first century. The goal of the evaluation of options is to articulate the risks associated with various CF-18 replacement options relative to their ability to fulfill the mission set outlined in the Canada First Defence Strategy. This report describes the method used to undertake the evaluation of options as part of the process to inform the Government of Canada’s decision on the best way forward for replacing the CF-18. |
---|
692 | 07|2gccst|aTechnical reports |
---|
693 | 4|aEvaluation of options |
---|
693 | 4|aCapability-based planning |
---|
693 | 4|aMeasures of performance |
---|
710 | 1 |aCanada. |bDefence R&D Canada. |
---|
830 | #0|aTechnical memorandum (Defence R&D Canada)|v2013-230|w(CaOODSP)9.820564 |
---|
856 | 40|qPDF|s977 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/rddc-drdc/D68-6-230-2013-eng.pdf |
---|