000	03257nam  2200349za 4500
001	9.828499
003	CaOODSP
005	20221107145046
007	cr |||||||||||
008	161201s2016    oncbd   o    f000 0 eng d
040	|aCaOODSP|beng
041	|aeng|bfre
043	|an-cn---
086	1 |aFs70-5/2016-103E-PDF
100	1 |aDuplisea, Daniel E., |d1968-
245	10|aContext and reinterpretation of reported redfish catch in Unit 1+2 in the 1980s and 1990s based on interviews with industry participants |h[electronic resource] / |cDaniel E. Duplisea.
246	1 |iTitle at head of French abstract: |aContexte et interprétation des captures de sébastes déclarées dans les unités 1 et 2 dans les années 1980 et 1990 sur la base d’entrevues avec des participants de l'industrie
260	|aOttawa : |bFisheries and Oceans Canada, |cc2016.
300	|av, 11 p. : |bcol. map, graphs.
490	1 |aCanadian Science Advisory Secretariat research document, |x1919-5044 ; |v2016/103, Quebec Region
500	|aCover title.
500	|a“November 2016.”
504	|aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 11).
520	|a"Previous model fitting exercises have revealed difficulties reconciling catch data with declines in biomass for Unit 1+2 redfish in the late 1980s and early 1990s. A series of interviews with redfish fishing industry participants from the 1980s and 1990s was conducted primarily to show how fish was caught, how much was caught and what was the composition of the catch at this time. Quasi-quantitative indicators of total fish catch and composition were determined from these interviews and suggest that the DFO reported catch data may underestimate total catch in this period by more than a factor of 2. Catch composition reported to DFO from this period shows only a very small percentage of fish <20 cm while these indicators suggest that 45-76% of the catch abundance in this period may have been constituted by fish <20 cm. It is assumed that because none of the fishermen's activities were prohibited during this period, and the fact that most have long since left the fishery, this information may be relatively unbiased. It is not suggested that reported catch data should be modified based on information from this study. This study is still too much of a patchwork of non-randomly sampled information to be considered a valid quantitative means of correcting these data hence the term quasi-quantitative is used throughout the document to describe the indicators developed here. Despite not being able to correct catch data using this study, the present work provides context for interpretation and possibly constraining model fitting results for this period"--Abstract, p. iv.
546	|aIncludes abstract in French.
692	07|2gccst|aFish
692	07|2gccst|aStatistics
710	1 |aCanada. |bDepartment of Fisheries and Oceans.
710	1 |aCanada. |bEcosystems and Oceans Science.
710	2 |aCanadian Science Advisory Secretariat.
830	#0|aResearch document (Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat)|x1919-5044 ; |v2016/103, Quebec Region|w(CaOODSP)9.507396
856	40|qPDF|s333 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/mpo-dfo/Fs70-5-2016-103-eng.pdf