<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc:record>
    <marc:leader>00000nam  2200000za 4500</marc:leader>
    <marc:controlfield tag="001">9.829417</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="003">CaOODSP</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="005">20221123120611</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="008">161220s2008    onc|||||o    f|0| 0 eng d</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CaOODSP</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">eng</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">n-cn---</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="086" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">YM32-2/2008-12E-PDF</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Davies, Alysia.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
      <marc:subfield code="a">The development of laws on electronic documents and e-commerce transactions </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="h">[electronic resource] / </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">Alysia Davies.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Revised 20 December 2008.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Ottawa : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Library of Parliament, </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">2008.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">29 p.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">[Background paper] ; </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">PRB 00-12E</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Issued also in French under title: L'élaboration de lois sur les documents et les transactions électroniques.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"This is a revised version of Facilitating Electronic Commerce through the Development of Laws to Recognize Electronic Documents and Transactions, prepared by Margaret Smith, formerly of the Library of Parliament, on 20 November 2000."</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"Electronic commerce has had a dramatic impact on the way in which business is done. Increasingly, business communications are being conducted online, as businesses adapt their operations to an electronic environment. In a new business environment where electronic transactions have become the norm, the use of paper to document business transactions is becoming less important. In fact, one of the benefits of conducting business by using digitized information is that it obviates the need to transmit and store paper. Although businesses are adapting to the electronic environment, legal rules continue to stipulate that certain transactions or documents be in writing. Many see such legal requirements as an impediment to transacting business electronically. It is argued that, with a few exceptions, there is little or no benefit in requiring that electronic transactions be put in written form and signed manually. Indeed, it is now widely recognized that legal requirements calling for written documents and manual signatures must somehow accommodate the world of electronic communications. This view has been the driving force behind efforts by international bodies and individual countries to develop rules which would give the same level of legal recognition to electronic transactions as is accorded to paper documents that perform the same function. This paper will review the development of legislation governing the use of electronic alternatives to paper-based forms of communication by the United Nations and in the United States, Australia, the European Union and Canada"--p.1.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Electronic commerce</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Legislation</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="710" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Canada. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Parliamentary Information and Research Service.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="775" ind1="0" ind2="8">
      <marc:subfield code="t">L'élaboration de lois sur les documents et les transactions électroniques </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.829422</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="830" ind1="#" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Background paper (Canada. Parliamentary Information and Research Service)</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">PRB 00-12E</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.504772</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="q">PDF</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="s">216 KB</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="u">https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/bdp-lop/bp/YM32-2-2008-12-eng.pdf</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
  </marc:record>
</marc:collection>
