000	03904nam  2200337za 4500
001	9.829443
003	CaOODSP
005	20221107145305
007	cr |||||||||||
008	161220s1993    onc     obs  f000 0 eng d
040	|aCaOODSP|beng
043	|an-cn---
086	1 |aZ1-1991/1-41-30E-PDF
245	00|aSectoral study - agriculture |h[electronic resource] : |bRoyal Commission on Aboriginal People / |cC.M. Williams.
260	|a[Ottawa] : |bRoyal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, |c[1993]
300	|a93, [26] p. : |bill.
500	|aHistorical publication digitized by the Privy Council Office of Canada.
500	|aImperfect: part of p. 78 is out of order in this digitized edition.
500	|aCover title.
500	|a"September 30, 1993."
504	|aIncludes bibliographical references.
505	0 |aBackground: a brief history of the pertinent information to the development of agriculture among the Aboriginal peoples in Canada, with particular emphasis on the prairie region, and by extension, the adjacent areas in the United States of America -- The structure of the current food system -- Land policy and land use -- Credit, capitalization and program support -- Agricultural project models -- Training needs and opportunities -- Recommendations -- References, readings and personal communications -- Appendix 1. Cost of producing grain crops in Saskatchewan 1992 -- Appendix 2. Discussion of results - fifteen year financial statement models for farrow-to-finish production unit -- Appendix 3. Game industry structure -- Appendix 4. Kick starting the Saskatchewan Indian Agricultural Program - history and techniques used -- Appendix 5. Aboriginal committee members.
520	3 |a“The topic of this paper, being partly an economic and partly a physical review of native agriculture, and conditioned by the social and political environment of native developments, demands that some broad recommendations on agriculture be made. Certain agricultural enterprises are quite specific, so other recommendations will reflect the details of how native farmers might respond to actual opportunities. Throughout the following pages, the reader will find that a few dominant issues arise repeatedly: Individual native farmers, but more particularly Band Councils, have to make a decision on whether, for their reserve situation, agriculture is to be a market responsive development, or whether it is merely a companion activity to a more significant need for a residential use of the land. In the case of market responsive agriculture, whether by individuals, the Band, or in a joint-venture; the land base, capitalization, scale of operation, management abilities and the access to markets must be comparable and competitive with the non-native communities. The development of reserve agriculture, has in large part, lagged far behind that outside of the reserves. As such, the efforts to "catch up" and become comparable must be greatly increased in terms of support, services available, education of participants, availability of credit and so forth. Native staffing is key to acceptance of agriculture as a development priority. Programs are of little value unless they are delivered by appropriate agents to recipients that are conditioned to receive the benefits. Native agriculture must have the organization for information transfer, and planning and execution of agricultural programs”--Intro., p. 1-2.
692	07|2gccst|aCommissions of inquiry
692	07|2gccst|aAboriginal peoples
692	07|2gccst|aAgriculture
700	1 |aWilliams, C. M.
710	1 |aCanada. |bPrivy Council Office.
710	1 |aCanada. |bRoyal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.
720	|aUniversity of Saskatchewan. Department of Animal and Poultry Science.
856	40|qPDF|s3.02 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/bcp-pco/Z1-1991-1-41-30-eng.pdf