<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc:record>
    <marc:leader>00000nam  2200000za 4500</marc:leader>
    <marc:controlfield tag="001">9.833952</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="003">CaOODSP</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="005">20221107150328</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="008">170714t20162017onc     ob   f000 0 eng d</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">978-0-660-08016-1</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CaOODSP</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">eng</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">n-cn---</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="086" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">J22-31/2017E-PDF</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Doob, Anthony N.,</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="d">1943-</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2">
      <marc:subfield code="a">A values and evidence approach to sentencing purposes and principles </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="h">[electronic resource] / </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">Anthony N. Doob.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">[Ottawa] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Department of Justice Canada, </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">2016, c2017.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">[30] p. (un-numbered pages)</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Issued also in French under title: Une approche des objectifs et des principes de détermination de la peine basée sur les valeurs et sur les preuves.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Cover title.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"October 2016.”</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Issued also in HTML format.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">“Sentencing purposes and the principles that guide sentences are a reflection of the values of the society that imposes these sentences. Sentences are, by their very nature, punishments. The nature of the punishments that are imposed by the state, as well as the quantity of the punishments that are imposed for certain acts, reflect the values of that society. Canada no longer has corporal or capital punishment. But, in historical terms, it was not long ago that we had both: Canada’s last legal execution took place in December 1962. Although the whipping of prisoners was fairly common between 1957 and 1967 – 333 recorded instances took place during that period – the last recorded legal use of the lash on a prisoner in a Canadian penitentiary occurred in October 1968. The reason we no longer whip or hang people is not that we ran out of leather or rope. Rather, it is because those punishments are no longer congruent with Canadian values. Sentencing, then, is all about values. Hence to understand what should be contained in the statement of the Purpose and Principles of Sentencing in the Criminal Code, we need to understand Canadian values with respect to sentencing. And to understand Canadians’ values on sentencing, we have to look first at our history”--Overview, p. [4].</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Criminal justice</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Court decisions</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Reform</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="710" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Canada. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Department of Justice. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Research and Statistics Division.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="775" ind1="0" ind2="8">
      <marc:subfield code="t">Une approche des objectifs et des principes de détermination de la peine basée sur les valeurs et sur les preuves </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.833954</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="q">PDF</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="s">601 KB</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="u">https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/jus/J22-31-2017-eng.pdf</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="q">HTML</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="s">N/A</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="u">https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/vea-avp/index.html</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
  </marc:record>
</marc:collection>
