00000000nam 2200000za 4500
0019.841596
003CaOODSP
00520221107152127
007cr |||||||||||
008170814s2000    onc    |o    f|0| 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aCS11-619/2000-5E-PDF
1001 |aRay, Gopa.
24510|aMonth-in-sample effects in the Labour Force Survey |h[electronic resource] / |cGopa Ray and Diane Stukel.
260 |a[Ottawa] : |bStatistics Canada, |c2000.
300 |a[22] p.
4901 |aWorking paper ; |v2000-5
500 |aDigitized edition from print [produced by Statistics Canada].
500 |a"HSMD-00-005E."
500 |a"November 2000."
504 |aIncludes bibliographic references.
5203 |a"The Canadian Labour Force Survey (LFS) uses a rotating panel design in which each selected dwelling remains in the sample for six consecutive months, and is then replaced by a new dwelling so that one-sixth of the overall sample is replaced each month. Each panel is designed to be representative of the population. However, studies have shown that the LFS experiences month-in-sample bias, particularly for the first month, i.e., the estimate of a variable based on the panel of dwellings which are in the sample for the first month differs significantly from the overall estimate. Measures of the month-in-sample-bias used in this study are the Bailar and modified Mohi month-in-sample indices, for estimated counts and rates of key LFS variables. The work of Brisebois and Mantel (1996) and Kennedy, Drew and Lorenz (1994) on the month-in-sample bias in the Labour Force Survey have been compared with those obtained in this follow-up, from the perspective of improved nonresponse and poststratification adjustments, using these month-in-sample indices"--Abstract.
69207|2gccst|aMethodology
69207|2gccst|aStatistical analysis
69207|2gccst|aSurveys
7001 |aStukel, Diane.
7101 |aCanada. |bStatistics Canada. |bMethodology Branch.
830#0|aWorking paper (Statistics Canada. Methodology Branch)|v2000-5|w(CaOODSP)9.834763
85640|qPDF|s1.86 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/statcan/11-613/CS11-619-2000-5-eng.pdf
986 |aCS11-619E no. 2000-05