000 02662cam  2200337za 4500
0019.848373
003CaOODSP
00520221107153647
007cr |||||||||||
008171206s2017    oncd    obs  f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aPS83-3/400E-PDF
1001 |aWilton, Geoff, |d1981-
24510|aCan the predictive validity of the Dynamic Factors Identification and Analysis – Revised be improved by calculated ratings? |h[electronic resource] / |cGeoff Wilton, Lynn A. Stewart & Laurence L. Motiuk.
260 |aOttawa : |bCorrectional Service of Canada, |c2017.
300 |axii, 58 p. : |bcol. charts
4901 |aResearch report ; |vno. R-400
500 |aIssued also in French under title: La validité prédictive de l’Instrument de définition et d’analyse des facteurs dynamiques révisé peut-elle être améliorée au moyen de cotes calculées?
500 |a"April 2017."
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 47).
520 |a“The Dynamic Factors Identification and Analysis – Revised (DFIA-R) is a key component of the Correctional Service of Canada’s (CSC) Offender Intake Assessment process. Implemented in 2009, it is the current tool designed to assess dynamic risk. The DFIA-R is comprised of 100 indicators across seven domains (employment/education, marital/family, associates, substance abuse, community functioning, personal/emotional, and attitude) assessed by parole officers. Based on their professional judgement, an overall dynamic need rating is generated as well as a rating on each domain. Recent research has demonstrated that the overall rating and each of the domain ratings are predictive of revocations of conditional release across offender groups. The present study examined whether calculated ratings could improve the predictive validity of the tool over the structured professional judgment provided by the parole officers at intake"--Executive summary, p. [iv].
69207|2gccst|aInmates
69207|2gccst|aParole
69207|2gccst|aRisk management
7001 |aStewart, Lynn Ann.
7001 |aMotiuk, Laurence L. |q(Laurence Louis), |d1954-
7101 |aCanada. |bCorrectional Service Canada. |bResearch Branch.
77508|tLa validité prédictive de l’Instrument de définition et d’analyse des facteurs dynamiques révisé peut-elle être améliorée au moyen de cotes calculées? |w(CaOODSP)9.848375
830#0|aResearch report (Correctional Service Canada. Research Branch)|vno. R-400|w(CaOODSP)9.506063
85640|qPDF|s990 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/scc-csc/PS83-3-400-eng.pdf