00000000nam 2200000za 4500
0019.852080
003CaOODSP
00520221107154514
007cr |||||||||||
008180220s1988    onc    #ob   f000 0 eng d
020 |z0-662-15879-2
040 |aCaOODSP|beng
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aJ23-3/17-1988E-PDF|zJ23-3/17-1988E
1001 |aCousineau, Douglas F.
24510|aLegal sanctions and deterrence |h[electronic resource] / |cDouglas Cousineau.
260 |aOttawa : |bDepartment of Justice Canada, Policy, Programs and Research Branch, Research and Development Directorate, |c1988.
300 |avii, 214 p.
4901 |aResearch reports of the Canadian Sentencing Commission
500 |aDigitized edition from print.
500 |aIssued also in French under title: Sanctions légales et dissuasion.
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 |a"It seems reasonable to assume that almost all adults in Canada and the United States have, at some time, been deterred from a criminal offense by considering the possible legal consequences. However, this common sense assumption, or even ubiquitous individual personal experience, may not constitute a sufficient evidential basis for the justification of legal sanctions in terms of their intended deterrent effects. The question is whether the deterrent effects result in the suppression and reduction of more crime than, a) the consequences flowing from other kinds of legal sanctions, not justified by deterrence outcomes, or and/or b) any other factors other than legal sanctions"--Introduction, p. v-vi.
69207|2gccst|aLegal issues
69207|2gccst|aResearch
69207|2gccst|aCrime prevention
7101 |aCanada.|bDepartment of Justice.|bResearch and Development Directorate.
7102 |aCanadian Sentencing Commission.
77508|tSanctions légales et dissuasion |w(CaOODSP)9.852081
830#0|aResearch reports of the Canadian Sentencing Commission.|w(CaOODSP)9.850400
85640|qPDF|s3.08 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2018/jus/J23-3-17-1988-eng.pdf
986 |aJUS-P-461