000 02335nam  2200337za 4500
0019.852445
003CaOODSP
00520221125095726
007cr |||||||||||
008180227s1988    onc    #ob   f000 0 eng d
020 |z0-662-15884-9
040 |aCaOODSP|beng
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aJ23-3/22-1988E-PDF|zJ23-3/22-1988E
1001 |aYoung, Alan N.
24514|aThe role of an appellate court in developing sentencing guidelines |h[electronic resource] / |cAlan Young.
260 |aOttawa : |bDepartment of Justice Canada, Policy, Programs and Research Branch, Research and Development Directorate, |c1988.
300 |aiii, 105 p.
4901 |aResearch reports of the Canadian Sentencing Commission
500 |aDigitized edition from print.
500 |aIssued also in French under title: Élaboration de lignes directrices en matière de la détermination de la peine : le rôle d'une cour d'appel.
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 |a"This report will examine the extent to which appellate courts have been successful in structuring and confining the discretion inherent in the sentencing process. Many people may be convinced that discretion is a necessary evil and that any attempt to structure the sentencing decision will thwart the important objective of imposing a sentence that is perfectly tailored to the circumstances of the offender and the offence. There can be little doubt that both offenders and offences are uniquely individual, and in recognition of the kaleidoscopic nature of human behaviour it is necessary to first provide some justification for the enterprise of creating uniform moral responses, as reflected in sentencing decisions, to this vast landscape of offences and offenders"--Introduction, p. 2.
69207|2gccst|aCourt decisions
69207|2gccst|aCriminal justice
69207|2gccst|aCourts
7101 |aCanada.|bDepartment of Justice.|bResearch and Development Directorate.
7102 |aCanadian Sentencing Commission.
77508|tÉlaboration de lignes directrices en matière de la détermination de la peine |w(CaOODSP)9.852448
830#0|aResearch reports of the Canadian Sentencing Commission.|w(CaOODSP)9.850400
85640|qPDF|s2.38 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2018/jus/J23-3-22-1988-eng.pdf