<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc:record>
    <marc:leader>00000nam  2200000za 4500</marc:leader>
    <marc:controlfield tag="001">9.861923</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="003">CaOODSP</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="005">20221107160859</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="008">180913s1979    onc     o    f000 0 eng d</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CaOODSP</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">eng</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">eng</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">fre</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">n-cn---</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="086" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">EC22-3/1979-147E-PDF</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Downie, Bryan M.,</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="d">1938-</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
      <marc:subfield code="a">The behavioural, economic and institutional effects of compulsory interest arbitration </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="h">[electronic resource] / </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">by Bryan M. Downie.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Ottawa : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Economic Council of Canada, </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">1979.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">viii, 100 p.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Discussion paper ; </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">no. 147</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"December 1979."</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Digitized edition from print [produced by the Publishing and Depository Services Directorate].</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Includes bibliographic references.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"Numerous concerns have been expressed regarding the wisdom of granting the right to strike to public sector employees. Indeed, serious proposals have been set forth to rescind or limit the right to strike. Similar concerns have also been articulated, at various times, with regard to the right to strike in "essential" industries in the quasi-public sector (e.g., the railroad and airline industries). There is a very limited set of options to replace the strike weapon; yet, if this sanction is abrogated, a viable dispute settlement proceduremust be found as a replacement. Compulsory interest arbitration is the only known viable substitute at this point in time. At the same time, it is clear that the consequences which would flow from a broader application of compulsory arbitration have not been thoroughly examined or thought through by policy makers and the public at large. Moreover, there are a number of variants with respect to arbitration, the consequences of which might vary quite substantially. This monograph examines, in eclectic fashion, the above dimensions in considerable depth"--Summary, p. iv.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Includes summary in French.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Arbitration</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Labour disputes</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Economic Council of Canada.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="830" ind1="#" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Discussion paper (Economic Council of Canada)</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">no. 147</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.855540</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="q">PDF</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="s">12.16 MB</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="u">https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2018/ecc/EC22-3-1979-147-eng.pdf</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
  </marc:record>
</marc:collection>
