000 01867nam  2200325zi 4500
0019.870537
003CaOODSP
00520221107163136
006m     o  d f      
007cr |||||||||||
008190325s1979    onc||||#ot   f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aCo22-159/1979E-PDF
1001 |aBreslaw, Jon A., |eauthor.
24510|aMore pitfalls in the testing of duality theory / |cJ.A. Breslaw, and J.B. Smith.
264 1|a[Ottawa] : |bDepartment of Communications, |c[1979]
300 |a1 online resource (19 pages)
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
500 |aDigitized edition from print [produced by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada].
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 |a"Burgess and Appelbaum have tested neoclassicaluality theory and concluded that cost and production models yield different estimates of the properties of the underlying technology. Both of these studies used aggregate US time series and assumed that the underlying production technology was homogeneous of degree one in inputs. In this paper, it is noted that the production model used by Burgess and Appelbaum is separable between inputs and outputs whereas the cost model includes no such separability. It is further shown that it is impossible to employ production models to uniquely estimate properties of a non-separable technology which is not linearly homogeneous"--Abstract.
69207|2gccst|aTelecommunications
69207|2gccst|aPricing
7001 |aSmith, J. Barry, |d1951- |eauthor.
7101 |aCanada. |bDepartment of Communications.
85640|qPDF|s986 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2019/isde-ised/Co22-159-1979-eng.pdf