000 02216cam  2200397zi 4500
0019.873904
003CaOODSP
00520221107164041
006m     o  d f      
007cr |n|||||||||
008190530s1989    onc    #ot   f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP
041 |aeng|bfre
043 |an-cn-on
0861 |aEn13-5/89-157E-PDF
1001 |aKwan, K. K., |eauthor.
24510|aSimple two-step sediment extraction procedure for use in genotoxicity and toxicity bioassays / |cby K.K. Kwan and B.J. Dutka.
264 1|aBurlington, Ontario : |bRivers Research Branch, National Water Research Institute, |c1989.
300 |a1 online resource (12, 4 pages).
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
4901 |aNWRI contribution ; |vno. 89-157
500 |aDigitized edition from print [produced by Environment and Climate Change Canada].
500 |a"September 1989."
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 |a"Three simple sediment extraction procedures, using Milli Q water, DMSO and methanol, were applied to 16 sediment samples collected from the Thames River, Ontario, Canada. The three extracts were tested for the presence of toxicity and genotoxicity using the Microtox, Toxi-Chromotest and Mutatox (with and without S-9) procedures. Results of the study indicated that the Mutatox, genotoxicity screening test was an extremely sensitive procedure responding to chemicals in all three types of extracts. Methanol was found to be more efficient than DMSO in extracting toxic and genotoxic chemicals from these sediments. Procedural details and results are discussed"--Abstract.
546 |aIncludes abstract in French.
69207|2gccst|aSediments
69207|2gccst|aWater pollution
7001 |aDutka, B. J., |eauthor.
7101 |aCanada. |bEnvironment Canada.
7102 |aNational Water Research Institute (Canada). |bRivers Research Branch.
830#0|aNWRI contribution ;|vno. 89-157.|w(CaOODSP)9.844121
85640|qPDF|s1.17 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2019/eccc/en13-5/En13-5-89-157-eng.pdf