Systemic risk and collateral adequacy : evidence from the great crisis / by Radoslav Raykov.: FB3-5/2019-23E-PDF

"Conventional collateral requirements are highly conservative but are not explicitly designed to deal with systemic risk. This paper explores the adequacy of conventional collateral levels against systemic risk in the Canadian futures market during the 2008 crisis. Our results show that conventional collateral levels adequately absorb crisis-level systemic risk, even allowing for an implausibly large margin of error. However, this occurs at the expense of unequal buffering of systemic risk across banks. We document that the largest systemic risk contributors are buffered relatively less than the rest and that there is a large cross-country difference in the behavior of US and Canadian institutions. Nonetheless, even this does not result in meaningful risk spillovers. The maximum expected market shortfall in excess of collateral comes up to at most 1% of the banks' market capitalization, and hence the added systemic risk does not exceed the effect of a 1% downward stock price move"--Abstract, page ii.

Permanent link to this Catalogue record:
publications.gc.ca/pub?id=9.875257&sl=0

Publication information
Department/Agency Bank of Canada.
Title Systemic risk and collateral adequacy : evidence from the great crisis / by Radoslav Raykov.
Series title Bank of Canada staff working paper, 1701-9397 ; 2019-23
Publication type Series - View Master Record
Language [English]
Format Electronic
Electronic document
Note(s) "June 2019."
Includes bibliographical references (pages 34-35).
Includes abstracts in English and French.
Publishing information Ottawa, Ontario, Canada : Bank of Canada = Banque du Canada, 2019.
©2019
Author / Contributor Raykov, Radoslav S., author.
Description 1 online resource (ii, 49 pages) : colour illustrations.
Catalogue number
  • FB3-5/2019-23E-PDF
Request alternate formats
To request an alternate format of a publication, complete the Government of Canada Publications email form. Use the form’s “question or comment” field to specify the requested publication.
Date modified: