000 03937nam  2200433zi 4500
0019.893795
003CaOODSP
00520221107173541
006m     o  d f      
007cr |n|||||||||
008201119e20090507oncd    ob   f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP
043 |an-cn---|ae-uk---|ae-fr---|an-us---
0861 |aIP54-103/2009E-PDF
1001 |aStoddart, Jennifer, |eauthor.
24510|aSurveillance, search or seizure powers extended by recent legislation in Canada, Britain, France and the United States : |bbackgrounder to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security : review of the Findings and Recommendations of the Internal Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in relation to Abdullah Almalki, Ahmad Abou-Elmaati and Muayyed Nureddin (Iacobucci Inquiry) and the report from the Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar (Arar Inquiry) / |cJennifer Stoddart, Privacy Commissioner of Canada.
264 1|aOttawa, Ontario : |bOffice of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada = Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada, |cMay 7, 2009.
300 |a1 online resource (21 pages) : |bcharts
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
500 |aIssued also in French under title: Pouvoirs de surveillance, de perquisition ou de saisie élargis par des lois récentes au Canada, au Royaume-Uni, en France et aux États-Unis : document d’information présenté par le Commissariat à la protection de la vie privée du Canada au Comité permanent de la sécurité publique et nationale : révision des constatations et des recommandations issues de l’enquête interne sur les actions des responsables canadiens relativement à Abdullah Almalki, Ahmad Abou-Elmaati et Muayyed Nureddin (enquête Iacobucci) et du rapport de la Commission d’enquête sur les actions des responsables canadiens relativement à Maher Arar (enquête Arar).
500 |aIssued also in HTML format.
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 17-21).
520 |a"The purpose of this survey is to examine the surveillance powers granted to government in several countries that have experienced recent acts of terrorism. The hope is that by examining the statutory basis for surveillance powers in the US, Canada, UK and France, a comparative picture of legal trends impacting state surveillance powers would emerge. Currently, there is much anecdotal discussion pitting the laws of one country against another, but little evidence-based analysis"--Executive summary, page 3.
61010|aCanada. |bParliament. |bHouse of Commons. |bStanding Committee on Public Safety and National Security.
61010|aUnited States.‏ |tUniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001.
61010|aCanada. |tAnti-terrorism Act.
61010|aGreat Britain. |tAnti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001.
61016|aFrance. |tLoi pour la sécurité quotidienne 2003.
650 0|aNational security|xLaw and legislation|zCanada.
650 0|aNational security|xLaw and legislation|zGreat Britain.
650 0|aNational security|xLaw and legislation|zFrance.
650 0|aNational security|xLaw and legislation|zUnited States.
7102 |aOffice of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, |eissuing body.
77508|tPouvoirs de surveillance, de perquisition ou de saisie élargis par des lois récentes au Canada, au Royaume-Uni, en France et aux États-Unis : |w(CaOODSP)9.905604
85640|qPDF|s196 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2021/cpvp-opc/IP54-103-2009-eng.pdf
8564 |qHTML|sN/A|uhttps://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-actions-and-decisions/advice-to-parliament/2009/parl_bg_090507/