000 03091cam  2200385zi 4500
0019.894985
003CaOODSP
00520221107173910
006m     o  d f      
007cr cn|||||||||
008201231t20202020onca    ob   f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP
043 |an-us---
0861 |aFB3-5/2020-57E-PDF
1001 |aExler, Florian, |d1986- |eauthor.
24510|aConsumer credit with over-optimistic borrowers / |cby Florian Exler, Igor Livshits, James MacGee and Michèle Tertilt.
264 1|aOttawa, Ontario, Canada : |bBank of Canada = Banque du Canada, |c2020.
264 4|c©2020
300 |a1 online resource (ii, 52 pages) : |bcolour illustrations.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
4901 |aStaff working paper = |aDocument de travail du personnel, |x1701-9397 ; |v2020-57
500 |a"Last updated: December 29, 2020."
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 40-43).
5203 |a"There is active debate over whether borrowers' cognitive biases create a need for regulation to limit the misuse of credit. To tackle this question, we incorporate overoptimistic borrowers into an incomplete markets model with consumer bankruptcy. Lenders price loans, forming beliefs—type scores—about borrowers' types. Since over-optimistic borrowers face worse income risk but incorrectly believe they are rational, both types behave identically. This gives rise to a tractable theory of type scoring as lenders cannot screen borrower types. Since rationals default less often, the partial pooling of borrowers generates cross-subsidization whereby over-optimists face lower than actuarially fair interest rates. Over-optimists make financial mistakes: they borrow too much and default too late. We calibrate the model to the US and quantitatively evaluate several policies to address these frictions: reducing the cost of default, increasing borrowing costs, imposing debt limits, and providing financial literacy education. While some policies lower debt and filings, they do not reduce over-borrowing. Financial literacy education can eliminate financial mistakes, but it also reduces behavioral borrowers' welfare by ending cross-subsidization. Score-dependent borrowing limits can reduce financial mistakes but lower welfare"--Abstract, page ii.
650 0|aConsumer credit|zUnited States|xEconometric models.
650 0|aCredit control|zUnited States|xEconometric models.
650 0|aBankruptcy|zUnited States|xEconometric models.
650 6|aCrédit à la consommation|zÉtats-Unis|xModèles économétriques.
650 6|aCrédit|xPolitique gouvernementale|zÉtats-Unis|xModèles économétriques.
650 6|aFaillite|zÉtats-Unis|xModèles économétriques.
7102 |aBank of Canada, |eissuing body.
830#0|aStaff working paper (Bank of Canada)|v2020-57.|w(CaOODSP)9.806221
85640|qPDF|s1.04 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2020/banque-bank-canada/FB3-5-2020-57-eng.pdf