|
000
| 03144nam 2200409zi 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 9.895225 |
|---|
| 003 | CaOODSP |
|---|
| 005 | 20230818074133 |
|---|
| 006 | m o d f |
|---|
| 007 | cr cn||||||||| |
|---|
| 008 | 210112t20202020oncad ob f000 0 eng d |
|---|
| 040 | |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP |
|---|
| 041 | 0 |aeng|beng|bfre |
|---|
| 043 | |an-cn--- |
|---|
| 086 | 1 |aD68-2/050-2020E-PDF |
|---|
| 100 | 1 |aHo, Geoffrey, |eauthor. |
|---|
| 245 | 10|aNaval operations room director team structure for employing advanced threat evaluation and weapons assignment (TEWA) / |cGeoffrey Ho, DRDC - Toronto Research Centre ; Prepared for: D Nav P&T 5. |
|---|
| 264 | 1|aOttawa, ON : |bDefence Research and Development Canada = Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada, |c2020. |
|---|
| 264 | 4|c©2020 |
|---|
| 300 | |a1 online resource (viii, 55 pages, 2 unnumbered pages) : |bcolour illustrations, graphs. |
|---|
| 336 | |atext|btxt|2rdacontent |
|---|
| 337 | |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia |
|---|
| 338 | |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier |
|---|
| 490 | 1 |aScientific report ; |vDRDC-RDDC-2020-R050 |
|---|
| 500 | |a"Can unclassified." |
|---|
| 500 | |a"June 2020." |
|---|
| 500 | |aCover title. |
|---|
| 504 | |aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 32-36). |
|---|
| 520 | 3 |a"The advancement of automation to support threat evaluation and weapons assignment (TEWA) for anti-air and anti-surface warfare has raised the question whether the current structure for operations room directors can be optimized. Under the Impact of Automation Project (01AB), four two director teams, composed of one operations room officer (ORO) and one Sensor Weapons Controller (SWC), conducted simulated missions in Defence Research and Development Canada’s (DRDC’s) Combat Resource Allocation Support (CORALS) system. Two team structures were examined. In the Traditional structure, the team simulated today’s team structure, with the SWC primarily responsible for both threat evaluation and weapons and the ORO approves the SWC’s actions. In the Functional structure, the ORO acted as a threat evaluator and the SWC was responsible for weapons. The trial also manipulated the level of TEWA automation. In one condition, the automation only recommended actions while in the second condition, it could act upon its own decisions, unless the operators intervened. The results suggested no strong benefit for the Functional structure, but did suggest that allowing for higher levels of TEWA automation was beneficial. If the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) employs more advanced TEWA though, it will have to address the issue of trust in the automation"--Abstract, page i. |
|---|
| 546 | |aIncludes abstract in French. |
|---|
| 610 | 10|aCanada. |bRoyal Canadian Navy |xWeapons systems|xAutomation. |
|---|
| 610 | 16|aCanada. |bMarine royale |xSystèmes d'armes|xAutomatisation. |
|---|
| 650 | 0|aSea control. |
|---|
| 650 | 6|aMaîtrise des mers. |
|---|
| 710 | 2 |aDefence R&D Canada. |bToronto Research Centre, |eissuing body. |
|---|
| 830 | #0|aScientific report (Defence R&D Canada)|vDRDC-RDDC-2020-R050.|w(CaOODSP)9.802305 |
|---|
| 856 | 40|qPDF|s1.25 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2021/rddc-drdc/D68-2-050-2020-eng.pdf |
|---|