00000000nam 2200000zi 4500
0019.897258
003CaOODSP
00520221107174537
006m     o  d f      
007cr mn|||||||||
008210308t20222022oncd    ob   f000 0 eng d
020 |a9780660377681
040 |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP
041 |aeng|beng|bfre
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aFs97-6/3423E-PDF
1001 |aDey, Cody J., |eauthor.
24512|aA method for the collaborative prioritization of freshwater fish habitat research questions / |cby Cody J. Dey, Adam I. Rego, Michael J. Bradford, Keith Clarke, Katherine McKercher, Neil J. Mochnacz, Alex de Paiva, Karin Ponader, Lisa Robichaud, Amanda K. Winegardner, Jonathan D. Midwood, and Marten A. Koops.
264 1|aBurlington, ON : |bFisheries and Oceans Canada, Ontario and Prairie Region : |bGreat Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, |c2022.
264 4|c©2022
300 |a1 online resource (vii, 119 pages) : |bgraphs.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
4901 |aCanadian technical report of fisheries and aquatic sciences, |x1488-5379 ; |v3423
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 18-22).
5203 |a"This document describes the methods used to collaboratively identify research questions that, if answered, would best support the freshwater fish habitat management activities of DFO’s Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Program. Our methods broadly followed those used in other collaborative research prioritization studies and involved a large group of freshwater fish habitat practitioners (i.e. ecosystem managers and policy experts) as well as a diverse group of researchers (internal and external to DFO). The main steps involved in our methodology included: i) the collation of 1903 knowledge gaps identified in previous publications and through an expert survey, ii) the refinement and collation of those knowledge gaps to produce a list of 334 candidate research questions, and iii) an online Delphi process to identify 93 research questions that were most important to habitat management, as well as identification of the amount of scientific resources (e.g. the costs) of answering each question and the amount of existing scientific knowledge relevant to each question. We discuss the general applicability of our approach to science planning within Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and suggest improvements to increase efficiency and repeatability of the process"--Abstract, page vi.
546 |aIncludes abstracts in English and French.
61010|aCanada. |bDepartment of Fisheries and Oceans|xManagement.
61016|aCanada. |bMinistère des pêches et des océans|xGestion.
650 0|aFreshwater fishes|xHabitat|xResearch|zCanada.
650 6|aPoissons d'eau douce|xHabitat|xRecherche|zCanada.
7101 |aCanada. |bDepartment of Fisheries and Oceans. |bOntario and Prairie Region, |eissuing body.
7102 |aGreat Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, |eissuing body.
830#0|aCanadian technical report of fisheries and aquatic sciences,|x1488-5379 ; |v3423.|w(CaOODSP)9.504449
85640|qPDF|s1.90 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2022/mpo-dfo/Fs97-6-3423-eng.pdf