|
000
| 03022cam 2200421zi 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 9.932656 |
|---|
| 003 | CaOODSP |
|---|
| 005 | 20240118130901 |
|---|
| 006 | m o d f |
|---|
| 007 | cr mn||||||||| |
|---|
| 008 | 240118e197912 bcca ob f000 0 eng d |
|---|
| 040 | |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP |
|---|
| 041 | 0 |aeng|beng|bfre |
|---|
| 043 | |an-cn-bc |
|---|
| 045 | |ax7x7 |
|---|
| 086 | 1 |aFs97-4/1544E-PDF |
|---|
| 086 | 1 |aFs97-4/1544 |
|---|
| 100 | 1 |aHay, D. E., |eauthor. |
|---|
| 245 | 10|aRecovery of tagged fish from a roe processing plant - a pilot study / |cby D.E. Hay and J.L. Mitchell. |
|---|
| 264 | 1|aNanaimo, British Columbia : |bDepartment of Fisheries and Oceans, Fisheries and Marine Service, Resource Services Branch, Pacific Biological Station, |cDecember 1979. |
|---|
| 264 | 4|c©1979 |
|---|
| 300 | |a1 online resource (iv, 16 pages) : |billustration. |
|---|
| 336 | |atext|btxt|2rdacontent |
|---|
| 337 | |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia |
|---|
| 338 | |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier |
|---|
| 490 | 1 |aFisheries and Marine Service manuscript report, |x0701-7618 ; |v1544 |
|---|
| 500 | |aDigitized edition from print [produced by Department of Fisheries and Oceans]. |
|---|
| 504 | |aIncludes bibliographical references (page 5). |
|---|
| 520 | 3 |a"The frequency of tag recovery in a roe processing plant was estimated by experimentally tagging herring as they were unloaded from a packing barge. A total of 298 fish was tagged: 99 in the hold of the barge and 199 on a conveyer belt as they entered the plant. On entering the plant, the fish were first moved to freezing units for temporary storage (up to several weeks) prior to roe extraction. Two hundred and forty-nine tags (83.6%) were recovered during three phases of the processing operation: 58 (19.5%) were recovered prior to freezing; 91 (30.5%) during thawing; the remaining 100 (33.6%) during roe popping. There was no difference in the frequency of recovery between large and small fish. Recovery frequency was not different between fish tagged on the barge and those tagged on the conveyer belt. Tag recovery frequency in this test probably is higher than that expected during future tagging programs but it is concluded that tag recovery from roe processing operations will be substantial. Recommendations about a reward system and procedures for handling recovered tags are suggested"--Abstract, page iii. |
|---|
| 546 | |aIncludes abstracts in English and French. |
|---|
| 650 | 0|aPacific herring|xMarking|zBritish Columbia|zSteveston. |
|---|
| 650 | 0|aFish tagging|zBritish Columbia|zSteveston. |
|---|
| 650 | 6|aHareng du Pacifique|xMarquage|zColombie-Britannique|zSteveston. |
|---|
| 650 | 6|aPoissons|xMarquage|zColombie-Britannique|zSteveston. |
|---|
| 710 | 1 |aCanada. |bFisheries and Marine Service, |eissuing body. |
|---|
| 710 | 2 |aPacific Biological Station (1972- ), |eissuing body. |
|---|
| 830 | #0|aManuscript report (Canada. Fisheries and Marine Service)|vno. 1544.|w(CaOODSP)9.924185 |
|---|
| 856 | 40|qPDF|s1.23 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2024/mpo-dfo/fs97-4/Fs97-4-1544-eng.pdf |
|---|