000	00000nam 2200000za 4500
001	9.612862
003	CaOODSP
005	20200330165351
007	ta
008	150406|1995||||xxc|||||     f|0| 0 eng d
020	|a0-662-24169-X
040	|aCaOODSP|beng
043	|an-cn---
086	1 |aLU2-153/215-1995E
110	1 |aCanada.|bHuman Resources Development Canada. |bUnemployment Insurance.
245	10|aEffects of Bill C-113 on UI take-up rates|cby Peter Kuhn.
260	|aOttawa - Ontario : |bHuman Resources Development Canada. |c1995.
300	|a40p. : |bfig., references, tables ; |c30 cm.
490	1 |aUnemployment Insurance evaluation series
500	|a"This study of Bill C-113's effects attempts to answer the following questions: What were its effects on the UI take-up rates of job quitters? Did it drastically reduce UI take-up rates and thus disentitle a lot of quitters from benefits, or (because of the "just cause" exemption) did it have only a small effect on the take-up? By what mechanisms did Bill C-113 reduce the claim rates of job quitters? Did fewer quitters apply for UI? Were more of the applications by quitters rejected by HRDC and/or did the disentitled workers become re-employed more rapidly than before?"--Abstract.
520	3 |aThis study of Bill C-113's effects attempts to answer the following questions: What were its effects on the UI take-up rates of job quitters? Did it drastically reduce UI take-up rates and thus disentitle a lot of quitters from benefits, or (because of the just cause exemption) did it have only a small effect on the take-up? By what mechanisms did Bill C-113 reduce the claim rates of job quitters? Did fewer quitters apply for UI? Were more of the applications by quitters rejected by HRDC and/or did the disentitled workers become re-employed more rapidly than before?--Abstract
563	|aSoftcover
590	|a96-06|b1996-02-09
690	07|aEmployment insurance|2gcpds
720	1 |aKuhn, Peter
776	0#|tEffects of Bill C-113 on UI take-up rates |w(CaOODSP)9.806194
830	#0|aUnemployment insurance evaluation series.|w(CaOODSP)9.514754
986	|aIN-AH-215E-08-95