| 000 | 00000nam##2200000za#4500 |
| 001 | 9.615244 |
|---|
| 003 | CaOODSP |
|---|
| 005 | 20211126112847 |
|---|
| 007 | ta |
|---|
| 008 | 150406|2000||||xxc||||| f|0| 0 eng|d |
|---|
| 020 | |a0-662-29134-4 |
|---|
| 022 | |a1192-5434 |
|---|
| 040 | |aCaOODSP|beng |
|---|
| 043 | |an-cn--- |
|---|
| 086 | 1 |aFB3-2/100-14E |
|---|
| 110 | 2 |aBank of Canada. |
|---|
| 245 | 10|aEmployment effects of nominal wage rigidity : |ban examination using wage-settlements data / |cby Umar Ahmed Faruqui. |
|---|
| 260 | |aOttawa - Ontario : |bBank of Canada |c2000. |
|---|
| 300 | |av, 22p. : |bfigs., references, tables ; |c28 cm. |
|---|
| 490 | 1 |aWorking paper|x1192-5434|v2000-14 |
|---|
| 500 | |a"This paper focuses on the employment effect of DNWR (downward nominal-wage rigidity). It reviews the evidence presented by Simpson, Cameron, and Hum (1998), in light of a potential bias problem associated with their reduced-form model.We describe modifications to their employment model that aim to better isolate the effects of DNWR on employment growth."--Abstract. |
|---|
| 520 | 3 |aThis paper focuses on the employment effect of DNWR (downward nominal-wage rigidity). It reviews the evidence presented by Simpson, Cameron, and Hum (1998), in light of a potential bias problem associated with their reduced-form model.We describe modifications to their employment model that aim to better isolate the effects of DNWR on employment growth.--Abstract |
|---|
| 546 | |aRésumé en français |
|---|
| 563 | |aSoftcover |
|---|
| 590 | |a00-32|b2000-08-11 |
|---|
| 690 | 07|aInflation|2gcpds |
|---|
| 690 | 07|aSalaries|2gcpds |
|---|
| 690 | 07|aEmployment|2gcpds |
|---|
| 720 | 1 |aFaruqui, Umar Ahmed |
|---|
| 776 | 0#|tEmployment effects of nominal-wage rigidity : |w(CaOODSP)9.571556 |
|---|
| 830 | #0|aWorking paper,|x1192-5434|v2000-14|w(CaOODSP)9.514622 |
|---|