00000nam##2200000za#4500 9.662371 CaOODSP 20210615120520 ta 150407|2000||||xxc||||| f|0| 0 eng|d 0-662-65379-3 CaOODSP eng eng fre n-cn--- HR21-53/2000 Canadian Human Rights Commission. Bona fide occupational requirements and bona fide justifications under the Canadian Human Rights Act : the implications of Meiorin and Grismer Ottawa - Ontario : Canadian Human Rights Commission 2000. English text, 11p. ; 28 cm. "...In 1999, the Supreme Court of Canada decided two important cases, which have major implications for employers and service providers when relying on a BFOR (bona fide occupational requirement) or BFJ (bona fide justification) defence. The decisions reinforce the duty to accommodate individuals who cannot meet an employment or service-delivery standard for reasons such as disability, sex, family status, or religion."--Preface. ...In 1999, the Supreme Court of Canada decided two important cases, which have major implications for employers and service providers when relying on a BFOR (bona fide occupational requirement) or BFJ (bona fide justification) defence. The decisions reinforce the duty to accommodate individuals who cannot meet an employment or service-delivery standard for reasons such as disability, sex, family status, or religion.--Preface Bilingual Softcover 01-09 2001-03-02 Human rights gcpds Discrimination gcpds Court decisions gcpds Exigences professionnelles justifiées et motifs justifiables dans la Loi canadienne des droits de la personne : fre (CaOODSP)9.662372