<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc:record>
    <marc:leader>00000nam  2200000za 4500</marc:leader>
    <marc:controlfield tag="001">9.827802</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="003">CaOODSP</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="005">20221107144907</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="008">161118s2003    oncado  ob   f000 0 eng d</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CaOODSP</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">eng</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">n-cn---</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="086" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">P24-640/2002E-PDF</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="110" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Canada.</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Public Works and Government Services Canada.</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Audit and Ethics Branch.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Evaluation of the Alternative Forms of Delivery initiative </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="h">[electronic resource].</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Evaluation of the Alternative Forms of Delivery initiative : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">project no. 330-1267</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">[Ottawa] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Public Works and Government Services Canada, </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">[2003]</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">ii, 77, 39 p. : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">ill.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Issued also in French under title: Évaluation de l'initiative des autres formes de prestation des services.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Cover title.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"Prepared by Consulting and Audit Canada in February 2003 for the Audit and Ethics Branch, PWGSC; AEB Project 2002-640; Audit and Ethics Committee 2003-10-31."</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Includes bibliograhical references.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">" … Real Property Services Branch (RPS) undertook a detailed Core Services Review in 1996, which ultimately resulted in the contracting out of property management services and certain project delivery services under the AFD initiative. An Evaluation Framework was developed for the AFD initiative and approved by PWGSC in 1998. This Framework identified the specific evaluation issues, questions and related performance indicators for future evaluation studies. It recommended that RPS review the implementation of the initiative, conduct a formative assessment toward the end of the contract’s three-year period, and undertake a summative evaluation at the end of the seven-year period. The Review of the Implementation of the AFD for Property Management Services, was completed in June 2000; a formative or interim evaluation, AFD – Program and Operational Review, was finalized in 2001; and this report comprises the summative evaluation of the AFD initiative. Due to a number of developments, which are discussed below, the timing for the summative evaluation was accelerated by nearly two years"--Background, p. 1.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="530" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Issued also in print format.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Property management</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Contracting</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Assessment</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Consulting and Audit Canada.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="775" ind1="0" ind2="8">
      <marc:subfield code="t">Évaluation de l'initiative des autres formes de prestation des services </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.827808</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="q">PDF</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="s">11.17 MB</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="u">https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/spac-pspc/P24-640-2002-eng.pdf</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
  </marc:record>
</marc:collection>
