00000000nam 2200000za 4500
0019.834993
003CaOODSP
00520221107150549
007cr |||||||||||
008170412s2017    onc     o    f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng
041 |aeng|bfre
043 |an-cn---|an-cn-ab
0861 |aJU14-29/2017E-PDF
24500|aIn the matter of s. 63 of the Judges Act, R.S., c. J-1 |h[electronic resource] : |bCanadian Judicial Council inquiry into the conduct of the Honourable Robin Camp : report to the Minister of Justice.
24630|aCanadian Judicial Council inquiry into the conduct of the Honourable Robin Camp : |breport to the Minister of Justice
24614|aIn the matter of Section 65 of the Judges Act, R.S., 1985, c. J-1, and of the inquiry committee convened by the Canadian Judicial Council to review the conduct of the Honourable Robin Camp of the Federal Court : |breport of the Canadian Judicial Council to the Minister of Justice
260 |a[Ottawa] : |bCanadian Judicial Council, |c2017.
300 |a[17] p. (un-numbered pages)
500 |aIssued also in French under title: Dans l’affaire de l’art. 63 de la Loi sur les juges, L.R., ch. J-1 : enquête du Conseil canadien de la magistrature sur la conduite de l’honorable Robin Camp : rapport à la ministre de la Justice.
500 |a"8 March 2017."
500 |aFrench title printed on cover: Dans l’affaire de l’article 65 de la Loi sur les juges, L.R., 1985, ch. J-1, et du comité d’enquête constitué par le Conseil canadien de la magistrature pour examiner la conduite de l’honorable Robin Camp de la Cour fédérale : rapport du Conseil canadien de la magistrature à la ministre de la Justice.
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 |a"From the time they are considered for appointment to the Bench, and every day thereafter, superior court judges in Canada are expected to be knowledgeable jurists. They are also expected to demonstrate a number of personal attributes including knowledge of social issues, an awareness of changes in social values, humility, fairness, empathy, tolerance, consideration and respect for others. In short, Canadians expect their judges to know the law but also to possess empathy and to recognize and question any past personal attitudes and sympathies that might prevent them from acting fairly. Those qualities sustain public confidence in the judiciary. For the reasons that follow, we find that Justice Robin Camp failed to meet those high standards and acted in a manner that seriously undermined public confidence in the judiciary. Accordingly, we recommend that Justice Camp be removed from office"--Introd., p. [3].
546 |aIncludes pref. matter in French.
60010|aCamp, Robin B.
69207|2gccst|aCourts
69207|2gccst|aEmployee discipline
69207|2gccst|aJudges
7102 |aCanadian Judicial Council.
7101 |aCanada.|bMinister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
77508|tDans l’affaire de l’art. 63 de la Loi sur les juges, L.R., ch. J-1 |w(CaOODSP)9.835217
85640|qPDF|s226 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/ccm-cjc/JU14-29-2017-eng.pdf