000 02123cam  2200325za 4500
0019.841015
003CaOODSP
00520221107152002
007cr |||||||||||
008170803s1995    onc    |o    f|0| 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aCS11-619/95-5E-PDF
1001 |aBeebakhee, Roanna M.
24512|aA comparison of two variance estimation techniques |h[electronic resource] : |bthe jackknife method and the linearized jackknife method / |cRoanna M. Beebakhee.
260 |a[Ottawa] : |bStatistics Canada, |c1995.
300 |a25 p.
4901 |aWorking paper ; |v95-5
500 |aDigitized edition from print [produced by Statistics Canada].
500 |a"HSMD-95-005-E."
500 |a"June 1995."
504 |aIncludes bibliographic references.
5203 |a"The jackknife method of variance estimation is used extensively for surveys with complex designs. Although it has desirable statistical properties, it is computer intensive resulting in relatively high costs. In addition, when it is used for estimating the variance of regression estimators under a stratified multi-stage cluster design, it requires the calculation of matrix inverses which has the potential of generating computational degeneracies. An alternative method, known as the linearized jackknife method has been proposed and its theoretical properties have been investigated by Yung and Rao (1995). An empirical study has been undertaken which applies both variance methods to a number of household surveys conducted by Statistics Canada. Further, the linearized jackknife variance method and the customary Taylor linearization variance method are compared to the jackknife method"--Abstract.
69207|2gccst|aStatistical analysis
69207|2gccst|aMethodology
69207|2gccst|aSurveys
7101 |aCanada. |bStatistics Canada. |bMethodology Branch.
830#0|aWorking paper (Statistics Canada. Methodology Branch)|v95-5|w(CaOODSP)9.834763
85640|qPDF|s3.00MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/statcan/11-613/CS11-619-95-5-eng.pdf