00000nam 2200000za 4500 9.846183 CaOODSP 20240719113922 cr ||||||||||| 171026s2017 oncd obs f000 0 eng d CaOODSP eng eng fre n-cn-qu Fs70-5/2017-060E-PDF Hammill, M. O. (Michael O.) A management framework for Nunavik beluga [electronic resource] / M.O. Hammill, G.B. Stenson and T. Doniol-Valcroze. Ottawa : Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat, 2017. v, 34 p. : charts (some col.) Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS), research document, 1919-5044 ; 2017/060, Quebec Region Cover title. “October 2017.” Includes bibliographical references (p. 23-26). “The signing of land claim agreements with Canada’s Inuit established co-management responsibilities for wildlife resources between the Inuit and Government of Canada. The co-management of wildlife resources transferred basic wildlife management responsibilities to co-management boards and restricted the veto powers of the responsible minister to overturn Board decisions. This has resulted in an apparent management paradox, since on one hand the Government’s ability to limit harvesting has been restricted, while on the other hand, Canada has international responsibilities to ensure a management structure based on Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) and the Precautionary Approach (PA). The rights of hunters to harvest are often highlighted in discussions with hunters, but other aspects of the land claim agreements call for the development of management systems that also respects the principles of conservation and continued sustainability of the resource. Thus, it would appear that the development of a PA/MSY based framework is consistent with the concepts and principles of recent land claim agreements implemented in Canada. Different management frameworks, some of which have been developed to manage marine mammal stocks in Canada were examined. Other stocks were also examined for discussion. Criteria were developed that could be used to determine if a stock could be managed using a framework where the probability of reaching the management objective within a specified timeframe can be identified explicitly, or whether a more general approach referred to as the Potential Biological Removal (PBR) should be used to set Total Allowable Harvest levels. Criteria were also developed that could be used to determine an appropriate Recovery Factor (FR) that could be used as part of the PBR calculation"--Abstract, p. iv. Includes abstract in French. gccst Whales gccst Fisheries management gccst Wildlife management Stenson, Garry B. (Garry Bruce), 1954- Doniol-Valcroze, Thomas, 1976- Canada. Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat. Research document (Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat) 1919-5044 ; 2017/060, Quebec Region (CaOODSP)9.507396 PDF 852 KB https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/mpo-dfo/Fs70-5-2017-060-eng.pdf