<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <marc:record>
    <marc:leader>00000nam  2200000za 4500</marc:leader>
    <marc:controlfield tag="001">9.848892</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="003">CaOODSP</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="005">20221107153803</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="007">cr |||||||||||</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:controlfield tag="008">171215s2017    onc     ob   f000 0 eng d</marc:controlfield>
    <marc:datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">CaOODSP</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">eng</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="043" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">n-cn---</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="086" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">XC39-1/1-421-10E-PDF</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="110" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Canada. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Parliament. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">House of Commons. </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Canada’s anti-spam legislation </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="h">[electronic resource] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">clarifications are in order / </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">Dan Ruimy, chair.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">[Ottawa] : </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="b">House of Commons, </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="c">2017.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">ix, 38 p.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology ; </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">10th report, 42nd Parliament, 1st session</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Issued also in French under title:  La loi canadienne anti-pourriel : des précisions s’imposent.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"December 2017."</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Original published on: 2017/12/13; published on: 2017/12/22.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references.</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">"Since Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (the Act) came into force in 2014, the amount of spam originating from Canada has decreased by more than a third. The evidence presented during this statutory review reveals wide differences of opinion about how the Act should be interpreted. The Committee joins its voice to that of witnesses demanding clear, effective, accessible and regularly updated guidance materials from enforcement agencies. Such materials should be designed with their end users in mind and supported by their feedback. While improving guidance and education should be a priority moving forward, it can only achieve so much. The Act and its regulations require clarifications to reduce the cost of compliance and better focus enforcement. Provisions defining “commercial electronic message,” consent, and “business-to-business” messages, among others, warrant the attention of the Government of Canada. The Government will be in a better position to assess the impact of the coming into force of the private right of action once these clarifications are implemented"--Summary, p. [1].</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Electronic mail</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Fraud</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Prevention</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="692" ind1="0" ind2="7">
      <marc:subfield code="2">gccst</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="a">Government policy</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Ruimy, Dan, </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="d">1962-</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="775" ind1="0" ind2="8">
      <marc:subfield code="t">La loi canadienne anti-pourriel </marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.848896</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="830" ind1="#" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="a">Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology ;</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="v">10th report, 42nd Parliament, 1st session</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="w">(CaOODSP)9.507011</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
    <marc:datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
      <marc:subfield code="q">PDF</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="s">4.24 MB</marc:subfield>
      <marc:subfield code="u">https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/parl/xc39-1/XC39-1-1-421-10-eng.pdf</marc:subfield>
    </marc:datafield>
  </marc:record>
</marc:collection>
