000 03155cam  2200397zi 4500
0019.879224
003CaOODSP
00520221107165444
006m     o  d f      
007cr cn|||||||||
008190912s2019    onc     ob   f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aPS83-3/432E-PDF
1001 |aFarrell MacDonald, Shanna, |eauthor.
24510|aAdjustment of the Security Reclassification Scale (SRS) : |belimination of the administrative segregation item / |cShanna Farrell MacDonald, Angela Smeth, Rebecca Sullivan & Dena Derkzen.
264 1|aOttawa, Ontario : |bCorrectional Service Canada = Service correctionnel Canada, |c2019.
300 |a1 online resource (vi, 38 pages).
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
4901 |aResearch report ; |vno. R-432
500 |aIssued also in French under title: Rajustement de l'Échelle de réévaluation de la cote de sécurité (ERCS) : élimination de l'élément relatif à l'isolement préventif.
500 |a"September 2019."
500 |aIssued by: Research Branch.
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references (page 17).
520 |a"The Security Reclassification Scale (SRS) is a research-based tool designed by the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) to help caseworkers determine the most appropriate level of security for an offender. More specifically, it includes factors related to institutional adjustment, escape risk, and public safety concerns. As administrative segregation policy has changed over the last few years, and with the elimination of administrative segregation with the impending passage of Bill C-83, this study examined the impact of dropping the segregation item on the validity of the SRS. This study used the dataset from the recent revalidation of the SRS (Farrell MacDonald, Beauchamp, Conley, Cociu, & Scott, 2018). Overall, 6,281 SRS assessments were examined for the study period from April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2016. These assessments represented 5,433 federal men offenders. For the purpose of this study, the dataset were randomly divided into construction (N = 3,141) and validation (N = 3,140) samples. Indigenous offenders accounted for 28% of each of the two samples. Revalidation analyses examined the modified scale’s reliability, convergent validity, and the prediction of relevant outcomes (e.g., offender security level, disciplinary charges and post-release outcomes)"--Executive summary, page iii.
69207|2gccst|aInmates
69207|2gccst|aClassification
7001 |aSmeth, Angela, |eauthor.
7001 |aSullivan, Rebecca, |eauthor.
7001 |aDerkzen, Dena, |eauthor.
7101 |aCanada. |bCorrectional Service Canada. |bResearch Branch.
77508|tRajustement de l'Échelle de réévaluation de la cote de sécurité (ERCS) : |w(CaOODSP)9.879225
830#0|aResearch report (Correctional Service Canada. Research Branch)|vno. R-432.|w(CaOODSP)9.506063
85640|qPDF|s473 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2019/scc-csc/PS83-3-432-eng.pdf