000 02653cam  2200433zi 4500
0019.884535
003CaOODSP
00520221107170904
006m     o  d f      
007cr cn|||||||||
008200211s1983    oncad   ob   f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP
0861 |aCo24-3/1-83-063E-PDF
1001 |aShen, Francis‏, |eauthor.
24512|aA quantitative comparison of active and passive damping for large space structures / |cby Francis Shen.
264 1|aOttawa, Canada : |bDepartment of Communications, Space Program : |bUniversity of Toronto, Institute for Aerospace Studies, |c1983.
300 |a1 online resource (1 volume (various pagings)) : |billustrations, graphs.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
4901 |aDOC contractor report ; |vDOC-CR-SP 83-063
500 |a"Department of Supply and Services contract no: OSU 82-00163, HSU.36100-2-4211."
500 |a"A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science in the University of Toronto."
500 |aDigitized edition from print [produced by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada].
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 48-49).
5203 |a"Damping has increasingly become a major issue in the control of the flexible modes of large space structures (LSS). In the past, the damping problem has been approached using two distinct techniques: active and passive damping, which have almost always been studied independently. It is therefore the intention of this report to present an interdisciplinary approach. A quantitative method for comparing active and passive damping according to weight and positivity criteria is outlined"--Abstract, page iii.
650 0|aDamping (Mechanics)|xMathematical models.
650 0|aArtificial satellites|xControl systems.
650 0|aArtificial satellites|xStability.
650 0|aSpace frame structures.
650 6|aAmortissement (Mécanique)|xModèles mathématiques.
650 6|aSatellites artificiels|xSystèmes de commande.
650 6|aSatellites artificiels|xStabilité.
650 6|aStructures spatiales.
7101 |aCanada. |bDepartment of Communications. |bSpace Program.
7102 |aUniversity of Toronto. |bInstitute for Aerospace Studies.
830#0|aDOC contractor report (Canada. Department of Communications)|vDOC-CR-SP 83-063.|w(CaOODSP)9.869864
85640|qPDF|s4.24 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2020/isde-ised/Co24/Co24-3-1-83-063-eng.pdf