000 03378nam  2200397zi 4500
0019.895275
003CaOODSP
00520221107174000
006m     o  d f      
007cr bn|||||||||
008210113t20042004oncd    ob   f000 0 eng d
040 |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP
0410 |aeng|beng|bfre
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aD68-7/116-2004E-PDF
1001 |aAbel, Sharon M., |eauthor.
24510|aRisk factors for the development of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian Forces personnel / |cSharon M. Abel.
264 1|aToronto : |bDefence R&D Canada, |c2004.
264 4|c©2004
300 |a1 online resource (xvi, 182 pages, 2 unnumbered pages) : |bgraphs.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
4901 |aExternal client report ; |vDRDC Toronto ECR 2004-116
500 |a"September 2004."
500 |aCover title.
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 33-39).
5203 |a"The escalating cost of claims for noise-induced hearing loss in the Canadian Forces supports the need to review and upgrade current hearing conservation practices. A prospective study was conducted to assess risk factors for the development of hearing loss in a wide range of military trades. A total of 1,057 individuals working in land, sea and air environments contributed their current hearing test results and first hearing test results on record. They also completed a 56-item questionnaire relating to demographics, occupational and non occupational noise exposure history, training in and utilization of personal hearing protection, and factors other than noise which might affect hearing, including head injury, ear disease, medications, solvent exposure and leisure noise. Medical personnel at five participating Canadian Forces military bases in Ontario and Nova Scotia recruited the subjects, distributed the questionnaires and assessed hearing. Apparatus and protocols for the latter conformed to current clinical practice. The prevalence of moderate to severe hearing loss progressed with years of noise exposure, with hearing thresholds in those over 45 years ranging broadly from normal to over 70 dB HL. Unprotected exposure to solvents and to leisure noise appeared to be significant determinates of adverse outcome, while the effects of head injury, history of ear disease, and the use of medications were minimal. The survey suggested that training on the hazards of noise exposure and the selection and utilization of hearing protection were inadequate. Hearing protection was reported to be incompatible with other gear, uncomfortable and an impediment to communication"--Abstract, page i.
546 |aIncludes abstract and executive summary in French.
61010|aCanada. |bCanadian Armed Forces |xEmployees|xHealth risk assessment.
61016|aCanada. |bForces armées canadiennes |xPersonnel|xRisques pour la santé|xÉvaluation.
650 0|aDeafness, Noise induced|zCanada.
650 6|aSurdité due au bruit|zCanada.
7102 |aDefence R&D Canada. |bToronto Research Centre, |eissuing body.
830#0|aExternal client report (Defence R&D Canada)|vDRDC Toronto ECR 2004-116.|w(CaOODSP)9.820568
85640|qPDF|s1.25 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2021/rddc-drdc/D68-7-116-2004-eng.pdf