|
000
| 01941cam 2200337zi 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 9.901642 |
|---|
| 003 | CaOODSP |
|---|
| 005 | 20221107175727 |
|---|
| 006 | m o d f |
|---|
| 007 | cr |n||||||||| |
|---|
| 008 | 210713e198902##oncd ob f000 0 eng d |
|---|
| 040 | |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP |
|---|
| 086 | 1 |aEn36-537/02-89E-PDF |
|---|
| 245 | 00|aComparison between aerobic and anaerobic treatment costs of chemi-thermomechanical pulping effluents / |ca report to Environment Canada; NovaTec Consultants Inc. |
|---|
| 264 | 1|aBurlington, Ontario : |bEnvironment Canada, Conservation and Protection, Wastewater Technology Centre, |cFebruary, 1989. |
|---|
| 300 | |a1 online resource (vi, 53 pages) : |bcharts. |
|---|
| 336 | |atext|btxt|2rdacontent |
|---|
| 337 | |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia |
|---|
| 338 | |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier |
|---|
| 490 | 0 |aReport WTC-BIO ; |v02-89 |
|---|
| 500 | |aDigitized edition from print [produced by Environment and Climate Change Canada]. |
|---|
| 504 | |aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 50-53). |
|---|
| 520 | 3 |a"A technical and economic comparison was carried-out between aerobic and anaerobic processes for the treatment of CTMP effluents. The treatment processes considered were: aerated lagoons with and without post clarification, activated sludge and high rate anaerobic treatment followed by an aerated polishing lagoon. The upflow anaerobic sludge blanket was selected as representative of anaerobic treatment processes"--Abstract. |
|---|
| 650 | 0|aWood-pulp industry|xWaste disposal. |
|---|
| 650 | 0|aSewage|xPurification|xBiological treatment. |
|---|
| 650 | 6|aPâte à papier|xIndustrie|xDéchets|xÉlimination. |
|---|
| 650 | 6|aEaux usées|xÉpuration|xTraitement biologique. |
|---|
| 710 | 2 |aNovaTec Consultants Inc, |eissuing body. |
|---|
| 710 | 2 |aWastewater Technology Centre (Canada), |eissuing body. |
|---|
| 856 | 40|qPDF|s2.22 MB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2021/eccc/En36-537-02-89-eng.pdf |
|---|