00000000nam 2200000zi 4500
0019.951931
003CaOODSP
00520250902144709
006m     o  d f      
007cr cn|||||||||
008250604e20250731oncd    obs  f000 0 eng d
020 |a9780660776835
040 |aCaOODSP|beng|erda|cCaOODSP
043 |an-cn---
0861 |aCS11-633/2025-58E-PDF
1001 |aLandry, Brandon, |eauthor.
24510|aPurchasing power parities for consumption and household income across the Canadian provinces and territories / |cby Brandon Landry, Ryan Macdonald, Peter Tarassoff and Jenny Watt.
264 1|a[Ottawa] : |bStatistics Canada = Statistique Canada, |cJuly 31, 2025.
264 4|c©2025
300 |a1 online resource (22 pages) : |bgraphs.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
4901 |aAnalytical studies : methods and references, |x2371-3429 ; |vno. 058
500 |aIssued also in French under title: Parité de pouvoir d'achat pour la consommation et revenu des ménages dans les provinces et les territoires du Canada.
500 |a"Correction date: August 14, 2025."
500 |aPublication replaced on September 02, 2025 as requested by the publisher.
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 20-21).
5203 |a"Regional economic disparities have been increasing in many high-income countries, leading to increased interest in the measurement of economic differences between regions. This paper develops regional purchasing power parities (PPPs) for Canada, which can be used to adjust for price levels while making interregional comparisons. Then, it uses these PPPs to create two price-adjusted measures of household disposable income per capita, analyzing differences in real income across the provinces and territories. Differences between the non-price-adjusted measures and the price-adjusted measures suggest that price adjustment is necessary to create an accurate picture of purchasing power across regions. For example, while Alberta has some of the highest price levels in the country, the province ranks highly in terms of PPP-adjusted household per capita, indicating that nominal income is high enough to compensate for high price levels. In contrast, British Columbia and Ontario fall in the rankings after PPP adjustment, indicating that nominal income is not high enough to compensate for high price levels in these provinces"--Abstract, page 5.
650 0|aPurchasing power parity|zCanada|vStatistics.
650 0|aDisposable income|zCanada|xStatistical methods.
650 0|aConsumption (Economics)|zCanada|xStatistical methods.
655 7|aStatistics|2lcgft
7102 |aStatistics Canada, |eissuing body.
77508|tParité de pouvoir d'achat pour la consommation et revenu des ménages dans les provinces et les territoires du Canada / |w(CaOODSP)9.951932
830#0|aAnalytical studies : methods and references (Statistics Canada)|x2371-3429 ; |vno. 058.|w(CaOODSP)9.821678
85640|qPDF|s651 KB|uhttps://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2025/statcan/11-633-x/11-633-x2025003-eng.pdf
8564 |qHTML|sN/A|uhttps://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-633-x/11-633-x2025003-eng.htm
986 |a11-633-X No. 058|a2025003