Comparison of benchmarking methods with and without survey error modelling / by Zhao-Guo Chen and Ka Ho Wu. : CS11-617/2003-6E-PDF
"In this paper, we will show the relationship among three types of benchmarking methods in the literature, namely the Denton (original and modified), the regression, and the signal extraction methods. Assuming the survey error series follows an AR(1) model, by simulation, we investigate the impacts of mis-specification of the model on the benchmarking predictions based on the criterion of minimizing root-mean-squared error of prediction. It is concluded that the survey error modelling procedure proposed by Chen and Wu (2000, 2001) may lead to results as good as those obtained from using the true survey error models"--Abstract.
Lien permanent pour cette publication :
publications.gc.ca/pub?id=9.840804&sl=1
| Ministère/Organisme | Canada. Statistics Canada. Methodology Branch. |
|---|---|
| Titre | Comparison of benchmarking methods with and without survey error modelling / by Zhao-Guo Chen and Ka Ho Wu. |
| Titre de la série | Working paper ; 2003-6 |
| Type de publication | Série - Voir l'enregistrement principal |
| Langue | [Anglais] |
| Format | Électronique |
| Document électronique | |
| Note(s) | Digitized edition from print [produced by Statistics Canada]. "BSMD-2003-006E." "November 2003." Includes bibliographic references. Abstract also in French. |
| Information sur la publication | [Ottawa] : Statistics Canada, 2003. |
| Auteur / Contributeur | Chen, Zhao-Guo,1943- Wu, Ka Ho Eden. |
| Description | 23 p. |
| Numéro de catalogue |
|
| Numéro de catalogue du ministère | 11-617-XPE no. 0306 |
| Descripteurs | Statistical analysis Methodology Surveys |
Demander des formats alternatifs
Pour demander une publication dans un format alternatif, remplissez le formulaire électronique des publications du gouvernement du Canada. Utilisez le champ du formulaire «question ou commentaire» pour spécifier la publication demandée.- Date de modification :