Bona fide occupational requirements and bona fide justifications under the Canadian Human Rights Act : the implications of Meiorin and Grismer: HR21-53/2000
...In 1999, the Supreme Court of Canada decided two important cases, which have major implications for employers and service providers when relying on a BFOR (bona fide occupational requirement) or BFJ (bona fide justification) defence. The decisions reinforce the duty to accommodate individuals who cannot meet an employment or service-delivery standard for reasons such as disability, sex, family status, or religion.--Preface
Permanent link to this Catalogue record:
publications.gc.ca/pub?id=9.662371&sl=0
| Department/Agency |
|
|---|---|
| Title | Bona fide occupational requirements and bona fide justifications under the Canadian Human Rights Act : the implications of Meiorin and Grismer |
| Publication type | Monograph |
| Language | Bilingual-[English | French] |
| Format | Physical text |
| Parallel description | [French] |
| Note(s) |
|
| Publishing information |
|
| Binding | Softcover |
| Description | English text, 11p. ; 28 cm. |
| ISBN | 0-662-65379-3 |
| Catalogue number |
|
| Subject terms |
Request alternate formats
To request an alternate format of a publication, complete the Government of Canada Publications email form. Use the form’s “question or comment” field to specify the requested publication.Page details
- Date modified: